Volker -- ...and then Volker Kuhlmann said... % ... % > 3.5. Setting variables based upon mailbox % > folder-hook [!]regexp command % > % > it says "command" - so this is *one* parameter % % I am sorry but IMHO that is rather far fetched. Other commands in mutt % don't need quoting, which adds confusion. A note there explicitly
Other commands don't need quoting just like a folder-hook command doesn't need quoting: if it is recognizable as a single command then you don't have to quote it, but if it contains common field delimiters (aka whitespace) then it needs to be quoted so that it is once again a single parameter. % saying that command needs quoting would rather improve the value of the Well, that "it might need quoting", anyway... % documentation to non-computer scientists and newbies. However, if the % general audience thinks that a software package doesn't need to be more % user-friendly then I'm happy to shut up. That isn't a bad idea (improving the documentation, I mean :-) It's pretty obvious to lots of people that the way to make sure your command is recognized atomically is to wrap it in quotes, but if you can come up with a good improvement then post it to the list for review and maybe it will make it into the next tarball. % % Volker % % -- % Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header % http://volker.orcon.net.nz/ Please do not CC list postings to me. You should set your Mail-Followup-To: header or tell mutt that you've subscribed to mutt-users when you take a moment to take care of the tab damage in your sig. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27520/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
