* On 2002.06.08, in <20020608212345.GB4832@sumida>,
* "Kevin Coyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
> as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
> automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute q
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:23:45PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
> I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
> as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
> automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt
> also gives you the o
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-06-08 23:34 -0400:
>=20
> I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
> as to whether mbox or M
Hi,
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-08 23:23]:
>I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion
>as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both
>automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt
>also gives you the option of sp
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> Note the requirement to use the hostname. Note that procmail doesn't.
> Procmail is broken.
Does on mine:
_vz.z77T7.titanium
[breser@titanium new]$ hostname
titanium
[breser@titanium new]$ procmail -v
procmail v3.14 1999/11/22, Copyr
So sprach »Magnus Bodin« am 2001-07-15 um 21:38:49 +0200 :
> I agree however, that the procmail filenames are ugly.
How do real maildir filenames look like? In reality, that is - we all
heard the spec :)
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (engl
So sprach »Tim Legant« am 2001-07-15 um 14:03:36 -0500 :
> "Okay, so you're writing messages. A unique name has three pieces,
> separated by dots. On the left is the result of time(). On the right is
> the result of gethostname(). In the middle is something that doesn't
> repeat within one
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> > > Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
> > > If procmail correctly foll
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> > Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
> > If procmail correctly followed the specification for maildirs,
> > duplicates would be impossi
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> >
> > 995153880.17759_1.teich
> > 995153880.17760_1.teich
> > 995153880.17761_1.teich
> >
>
> Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
> If procmail correctly followed the specification for maildirs
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:42:03AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach »Walt Mankowski« am 2001-07-13 um 19:04:43 -0400 :
> > Maildirs have some neat advantages of their own. For example it's
> > very easy to merge two folders together. I send mail from my laptop,
>
> Hmm, dunno, but I f
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> > How much
> > of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox?
>
> I think this is really rather subjective and per-system issue, whatever
> figures someone else might come up wit
Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> How much
> of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox?
I think this is really rather subjective and per-system issue, whatever
figures someone else might come up with on their system might be totally
off the mark on you
13 matches
Mail list logo
