Re: Headers in Editor

2021-08-29 Thread José María Mateos
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Rene Kita wrote: The idea behind this is, that can you view/edit the headers while replying. That's why the headers are cleared if you delete these lines. They want end up in the body of that mail. As already that said in another reply, 'set edit_headers

Re: Headers in Editor

2021-08-29 Thread Rene Kita
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 09:24:36AM -0400, David J. Ring, Jr. wrote: > I have the strangest problem. > > When I reply to a message in a new installation of mutt, what will > eventually become the addresses, and subject, and In-Reply-To threading > informaton becomes the top lines of the editor!

Re: Headers in Editor

2021-08-29 Thread David J. Ring, Jr.
How could I have missed that! Thank you - I have NO idea why it's working on one computer but not this one. But now thank to your help it's working fine. Thank you! David On 08/29/ , ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: > 12021/06/00 03:92.08 ನಲ್ಲಿ, "David J. Ring, Jr." ಬರೆದರು: > > I have the strangest probl

Re: Headers in Editor

2021-08-29 Thread ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್
12021/06/00 03:92.08 ನಲ್ಲಿ, "David J. Ring, Jr." ಬರೆದರು: > I have the strangest problem. > > When I reply to a message in a new installation of mutt, what will > eventually become the addresses, and subject, and In-Reply-To threading > informaton becomes the top lines of the editor! > > If I w

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-02-01 Thread Luis Mochan
Thanks! This must be it! I'm using mutt as distributed by Debian/testing. I'm attaching the output of mutt -v in case it helps to completely identify my version. Thanks and best regards, Luis On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:15:58AM +, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:10:52AM +0

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:10:52AM +, Michael Elkins wrote: I just did a test and it does appear that Mutt is properly encoding the header: Resent-To: Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Moch=E1n?= This is change that fixed the above problem. It looks like the package of mutt you are using doesn't inc

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:06:42AM +, Michael Elkins wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:42:14PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: Of course, in this example Amavis rejected the message, but it seems it did so for a good reason, as the message had this strange characters \303\241. So I guess the probl

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Elkins
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:42:14PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: Of course, in this example Amavis rejected the message, but it seems it did so for a good reason, as the message had this strange characters \303\241. So I guess the problem is my configuration of mutt (or mutt itself). That is the ut

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-30 Thread Luis Mochan
> Could have to do with your character set, or whether the email itself is > encoded as 7 bit or 8 bit, I believe you are right, but I don't know though how to control this. On the other hand, forwarding mails, as opposed to bouncing them, has not failed. > but I'm suspecting it may have more to

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-29 Thread Will Yardley
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:01:55PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > I made some tests and... I'm even more confused. For some reason, if I > bounce your message to myself (through my alias) it arrives without > problem. However, if I compose a message to myself and then bounce it > to myself, it is rej

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-29 Thread Luis Mochan
m ns1.veggiechinese.net (HELO aura.veggiechinese.net) ([66.215.1.146]) by dm.gbnet.net with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2013 17:23:09 + Received: by aura.veggiechinese.net (Postfix, from userid 1228) id AE5581014; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:23:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-29 Thread Will Yardley
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:33:36PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > I mean the fullname. For example, my alias file contains the line > >alias mochan Luis Mochán > > so if I bounce a mail to myself (b mochan) the alias is expanded and > the á in my last name produces the failure. Hrm. I te

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-28 Thread Luis Mochan
I mean the fullname. For example, my alias file contains the line alias mochan Luis Mochán so if I bounce a mail to myself (b mochan) the alias is expanded and the á in my last name produces the failure. Regards, Luis On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:18:19PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: >

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-28 Thread Will Yardley
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:34:55PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote: > I wonder if someone knows how to 'bounce' a message to > a recipient whose name contains special characters, such as the > accents áéíóú? I can 'forward', but 'bounce' fails. The manual > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-2.html#f

Re: headers in mail vs forward vs bounce

2013-01-26 Thread Luis Mochan
I wonder if someone knows how to 'bounce' a message to a recipient whose name contains special characters, such as the accents áéíóú? I can 'forward', but 'bounce' fails. The manual http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-2.html#forwarding_mail doesn't seem to address this problem. Of course, I coul

Re: headers encoding

2002-05-11 Thread Andrey R. Urazov
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:52:53PM +0700, Andrey R. Urazov wrote: > But I have found a problem. I store aliases file in UTF8 and my terminal is > set to use this encoding. But when I use Cyrillic letters in an alias as > someone's full name, it gets displayed as sequence of question marks in > Mut

Re: headers encoding

2002-05-11 Thread Andrey R. Urazov
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > | Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Datenm=FCll?= umwandeln > '=FC' is the encoded character (ü). Thanks a lot, Rocco. Now I see. And all the messages whose headers are not encoded in such a way are displayed incorrectly. With the right mess

Re: headers encoding

2002-05-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Andrey R. Urazov [05/11/02 13:36:50 CEST] wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: [...] > > Headers have to encoded word by word if there's something in them, > > which has to encoded. > What do you mean, Rocco? Any special encoding? Yes. > Please explain me

Re: headers encoding

2002-05-11 Thread Andrey R. Urazov
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > it's quite natural that heading of a message be written in the same > > language as the message body. For that reason I often get letters > > with subject lines or "From" fields in Russian encoded in some > > encoding including codes

Re: headers encoding

2002-05-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Andrey R. Urazov [05/11/02 10:44:23 CEST] wrote: > it's quite natural that heading of a message be written in the same > language as the message body. For that reason I often get letters with > subject lines or "From" fields in Russian encoded in some encoding > including codes for Cyrillic

Re: headers in incoming mail

2000-05-26 Thread Manuel Arriaga
Hi Frank, Thanks, setting alternates to my own address got the Fcc: mailbox to automatically show the recipient. Cheers, Manuel > > > > - Is it possible to set up your Fcc: mailbox (in my case > > Mail/Sent) so that it displays the messages recipiend in the > > index, instead of the sender (

Re: headers in incoming mail

2000-05-26 Thread Manuel Arriaga
Hi David, > > - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part >of the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the different >lines, too. Is this possible? > > Read the manual regarding the hdr_order directive. Thanks, now they look as I

Re: headers in incoming mail

2000-05-26 Thread Frank Matthiess
Friday den 26.05.2000 um 13:12 CEST +0200, schrieb Manuel Arriaga: > Hi all, > > Two short config questions: > > - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep > the visible part of the headers in incoming mail readable, but > now I would like to sort the different lines, too.

Re: headers in incoming mail

2000-05-26 Thread David Champion
On 2000.05.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Manuel Arriaga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Two short config questions: > > - I have put "ignore (blabla)" into my .muttrc in order to keep the visible part of >the headers in incoming mail readable, but now I would like to sort the d

Re: headers.

2000-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:06:03PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:48:02PM +0100, Reinoud Koornstra wrote: > > > when i mail to myself i see at the a Delivered-To: header. I set the > Delivered-To: is appended by Postfix > Or by qmail (see http://www.qmail.org) Fr

Re: headers.

2000-02-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Reinoud Koornstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 15 Feb 2000: > As you can see twice an X-Mailer and a Delivered-To: > I set for X-Mailer this: Mutt, see http://www.mutt..org/ > But the first X-Mailer header i didnt set and i want to get rid of that > one. Placing unmy_hdr X-Mailer: before defi

Re: headers.

2000-02-15 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 01:48:02PM +0100, Reinoud Koornstra wrote: > when i mail to myself i see at the a Delivered-To: header. I set the Delivered-To: is appended by Postfix -- Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb I'm locked in a maze of little projects, all of w

Re: headers

1999-07-28 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Erik -- ...and then erik said... % Hi, % % I have a question, I use mutt and am new to it and linux. What I want Welcome! % to know is that I noticed that if I forward a message that has FW: (or % something similiar), it still adds another one. Is there a way to % stop mutt frokm doing this