Re: Folders do not display in SideBar

2022-03-23 Thread Philip Rhoades
Akshay, On 2022-03-06 13:25, Akshay Hegde wrote: On 2022-03-06 13:09 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: Adding mailboxes like that would not be viable - I have: 705 primary Maildir folders and: 2,708 total Maildir folders - and they are constantly changing - Mutt needs to autodetect ALL th

Re: Folders do not display in SideBar

2022-03-05 Thread Akshay Hegde
On 2022-03-06 13:09 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: > > > Adding mailboxes like that would not be viable - I have: > > 705 primary Maildir folders > > and: > > 2,708 total Maildir folders > > - and they are constantly changing - Mutt needs to autodetect ALL the > current folders somehow . .

Re: Folders do not display in SideBar

2022-03-05 Thread Philip Rhoades
Akshay, On 2022-03-06 09:28, Akshay Hegde wrote: Hello, On 2022-03-06 04:04 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I am using mutt-2.1.5-1.fc35.x86_64 with the lines below in .muttrc - but after much Googling, I can't get any permuations of these configs to display ANY folders in the sideba

Re: Folders do not display in SideBar

2022-03-05 Thread Akshay Hegde
Hello, On 2022-03-06 04:04 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > I am using mutt-2.1.5-1.fc35.x86_64 with the lines below in .muttrc - but > after much Googling, I can't get any permuations of these configs to display > ANY folders in the sidebar - am I missing something? > > Thanks, > > P

Re: Folders not in the sidebar list of folders

2013-08-05 Thread John Niendorf
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:24:05PM -0400, staticsafe wrote: You can also "subscribe" to the folder in IMAP terms and it will show up in the sidebar since you have imap_check_subscribed set to yes. [0] - http://www.lunar-linux.org/mutt-sidebar/ -- Thank you, I just realized hitting s will sub

Re: Folders not in the sidebar list of folders

2013-08-05 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* John Niendorf [08-05-13 14:15]: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > >I think it should be listed in mailboxes. I use mutt-kz (a mutt fork > >with sidebar patch applied), and that is what I have to do. > > >Hope this helps, > > Yeah that is the funny thing. I don

Re: Folders not in the sidebar list of folders

2013-08-05 Thread staticsafe
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:11:14PM +0200, John Niendorf wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > >I think it should be listed in mailboxes. I use mutt-kz (a mutt fork > >with sidebar patch applied), and that is what I have to do. > > >Hope this helps, > > Yeah th

Re: Folders not in the sidebar list of folders

2013-08-05 Thread John Niendorf
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: I think it should be listed in mailboxes. I use mutt-kz (a mutt fork with sidebar patch applied), and that is what I have to do. Hope this helps, Yeah that is the funny thing. I don't see anywhere in my .muttrc file where I expli

Re: Folders not in the sidebar list of folders

2013-08-05 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:18:01PM +0200, John Niendorf wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am running Mutt 1.5.21 with the sidebar patch. (Mutt-patched in the Ubuntu > repository) > I'm using an IMAP account and all the mail is stored on the server. > Today I noticed that some mail folders I made on the ser

Re: Folders, Sorting, SSH

2008-02-29 Thread Michael Kjorling
On 29 Feb 2008 17:00 +0100, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (wishi): > Can I sort mailing lists into separate folders, too? > - I found the list command... but it's not sorting my stuff at all. > > I. e. I'm on the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the subject is always [bar]. Is > there > any sorting feature to

Re: Folders, Sorting, SSH

2008-02-29 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, February 29 at 05:00 PM, quoth wishi: > I'm going to use mutt as MUA... but I'm new here, and so I have got > 3 questions. Hopefully, it's possible: Glad to have you aboard! Let's see what we can do. > 1. I'm using mailing lists, and a k

Re: folders

2002-06-18 Thread Jan Groenewald
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:03:25PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % How do I set mutt so that a folder is automatically deleted > % when I delete the last message therein? I searched the docs > % for 'remove', 'delete' and 'quadoption' and 'folder'. Did > % I miss it? > Hint: do a search for "save" a

Re: folders

2002-06-18 Thread Sven Hartenstein
> How do I set mutt so that a folder is automatically deleted > when I delete the last message therein? I searched the docs > for 'remove', 'delete' and 'quadoption' and 'folder'. Did > I miss it? unset save_empty Sven

Re: folders

2002-06-18 Thread David T-G
Jan -- ...and then Jan Groenewald said... % % Mutters, % % How do I set mutt so that a folder is automatically deleted % when I delete the last message therein? I searched the docs % for 'remove', 'delete' and 'quadoption' and 'folder'. Did % I miss it? Actually, "remove" in manual.txt would d

Re: folders ? [2]

2002-02-07 Thread Nico Schottelius
> did the original poster even say (s)he was using fetchmail? He uses shift+g. Nico Please CC me! msg24293/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: folders ? [2]

2002-02-07 Thread Rob Reid
At 2:38 PM EST on February 7 Nico Schottelius sent off: > > Depends on when you want it sorted. Mutt does have the capability to > > save read mails to certain folders automagically, but that is after it > > has already been delivered to your spool file > > Howto do that ? Does this work with

Re: folders ? [2]

2002-02-07 Thread Nico Schottelius
fished that out of the mailing list archive. > Depends on when you want it sorted. Mutt does have the capability to > save read mails to certain folders automagically, but that is after it > has already been delivered to your spool file Howto do that ? Does this work with Maildir boxes ? Could

Re: fetchmail to MTA to procmail (WAS Re: folders ?)

2002-02-02 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 Jeremy Blosser spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > You're missing the point. fetchmail is not involved when you use Mutt's > built in POP fetch-mail function, even though the names are similar. That > function just brings the mail directly into the folders, it bypasses

Re: fetchmail to MTA to procmail (WAS Re: folders ?)

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Prahlad Vaidyanathan [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: > [-- snip --] > > > fetchmail -> MTA -> procmail -> folder(s) > > > > > or am I missing something ? > > > > What I meant was that when you hit G for the default getmail function

fetchmail to MTA to procmail (WAS Re: folders ?)

2002-01-31 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > > fetchmail -> MTA -> procmail -> folder(s) > > > or am I missing something ? > > What I meant was that when you hit G for the default getmail function > that mutt has, it doesn't run it thru procmail, it just gets it.

Re: folders ?

2002-01-31 Thread Ken Wahl
Prahlad Vaidyanathan on 31/01/2002 at 04:08 opined thusly: > Hmm .. I thought fetchmail injected things into your MTA. So, it should > have the same route as if you called it from the command-line. ie : > > fetchmail -> MTA -> procmail -> folder(s) > You are correct. That is the default b

Re: folders ?

2002-01-30 Thread Knute
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: > [-- snip --] > > There are others, but procmail is what i use with fetchmail, and it > > seems to work well for me. The one thing that I have found is that > > Mutt's own getmail function doesn

Re: folders ?

2002-01-30 Thread Will Yardley
Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: > [-- snip --] > > There are others, but procmail is what i use with fetchmail, and it > > Hmm .. I thought fetchmail injected things into your MTA. So, it should > have the same route as if you called it from the com

Re: folders ?

2002-01-30 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > There are others, but procmail is what i use with fetchmail, and it > seems to work well for me. The one thing that I have found is that > Mutt's own getmail function doesn't send it thru procmail. Don't know > how to change t

Re: folders ?

2002-01-30 Thread Knute
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Nico Schottelius wrote: > Hello dear list! > Is it possible to use folders with mutt ? Yes. > If yes, is autosort possible ? > Like mails for nicos-mutt goto mutt/, mails to > mailing lists goto lists/gpm lists/lkml ? Depends on when you want it sorted. Mutt does have

Re: folders

2001-06-01 Thread Sam Roberts
Quoting Troy Heber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote: > I have a quick question about folders. > > I have my .muttrc setup like this: > > mailboxes /var/spool/mail/troyhebe set spoolfile=/var/spool/mail/troyhebe > set folder=~/tmail Don't you have to set folder before before useing the '+' shor

Re: Folders don't display "new" status/Signing messages

2000-02-03 Thread Randall J . Million
> Sorry to piggyback on your post, but this brings up a question I have > about this definition. Is it possible to specify "all mailboxes in my > $folder directory?" > > None of them worked. Can it be done? Yes. ie, mailboxes =Inbox `echo $HOME/Mail/l/*` randy -- Five hundred, twenty-five

Re: Folders don't display "new" status/Signing messages

2000-02-03 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000: > Sorry to piggyback on your post, but this brings up a question I have > about this definition. Is it possible to specify "all mailboxes in my > $folder directory?" Yes, use something like: mailboxes `echo ~/mail/*` Mikko -- // Mik

Re: Folders don't display "new" status/Signing messages

2000-02-03 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 03:04:17PM -0800 or thereabouts, Joshua Haberman wrote: > For some reason, mutt fails to display the "N" next to folders with new > messages in them on the folder index. The default folder_format string > begins with %N and should do the trick, and I additionally tried > ma

Re: Folders don't display "new" status/Signing messages

2000-02-02 Thread Jim Breton
You have to set the "mailboxes" line in your .muttrc. http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.10 Sorry to piggyback on your post, but this brings up a question I have about this definition. Is it possible to specify "all mailboxes in my $folder directory?" I tried: = =* =/* and ~/ma

Re: folders

1999-06-07 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"