On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:19:22PM +0300, Jayson Willson wrote:
> Hello! Your words sound reasonable, and it seems like macro would be
> enough, and folder hooks are not needed.
> However, I am not sure, if I understand for all of this works, so it
> would be great to hear, what do those familiar
Hello! Your words sound reasonable, and it seems like macro would be
enough, and folder hooks are not needed.
However, I am not sure, if I understand for all of this works, so it
would be great to hear, what do those familiar with mutt say.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:53:14AM -0400, Matthew Philli
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:22:25AM +0300, Jayson Willson wrote:
> Hi, Am!
> It seems like I have managed to get it working:
> I got rid of account-hooks, defined username and password in per-account
> configs and added following to muttrc:
> folder-hook userna...@gmail.com 'source ~/.mutt/username1
Hi, Am!
It seems like I have managed to get it working:
I got rid of account-hooks, defined username and password in per-account
configs and added following to muttrc:
folder-hook userna...@gmail.com 'source ~/.mutt/username1'
folder-hook userna...@gmail.com 'source ~/.mutt/username2'
It appeared t
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0300, Jayson Willson wrote:
> Hello!
> I have the following configuration (two IMAP and SMTP accounts):
> > cat .mutt/muttrc
> pastebin.com/NN7EJF8E
> > cat .mutt/user1
> http://pastebin.com/w19fSTqh
> And user2 is configured in the same way.
> With such config
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0300, Jayson Willson wrote:
> Hello!
> I have the following configuration (two IMAP and SMTP accounts):
> > cat .mutt/muttrc
> pastebin.com/NN7EJF8E
> > cat .mutt/user1
> http://pastebin.com/w19fSTqh
> And user2 is configured in the same way.
> With such configur
