begin quoting what Magnus Bodin said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:29:44AM +0100:
>
> Wouldn't it be a better solution to keep the whole sent-mail-folder
> encrypted to using the open/close-hook-thingies in the
> compressed-folders-patch?
Probably be easier to put ~/Mail on a cfs filesystem.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a better solution to keep the whole sent-mail-folder
> encrypted to using the open/close-hook-thingies in the
> compressed-folders-patch?
>
> Then the security issues with having all external encrypted mail
> being encrypted to self wil
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:20:56AM +1100, David Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote:
>
> >
> > Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if
> > anyone else has solved this problem...
> >
>
> The way I got around this problem was to put "encrypt-to " i
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote:
>
> Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if
> anyone else has solved this problem...
>
The way I got around this problem was to put "encrypt-to " in
my gnupg options file. That way all messages are encrypted to me and
the ot
begin quoting what Alan Batie said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:03:24PM -0800:
> first place. I discovered the fcc_clear option, which saves the message
> unencrypted and have been living with that, but what I *really* want is to
> save them encrypted to *me*.
Mutt doesn't do that, but PGP does.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:38:44PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > what I *really* want is to save them encrypted to *me*.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg22312.html
Perfect! Thanks...
--
Alan Batie __www.rdrop.com/users/alan Me
[E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Alan Batie on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:03:24PM -0800:
> what I *really* want is to save them encrypted to *me*.
See the archives from the past week... I seem to remember it coming up.
Also, a quick search gives this:
http://www.mail-
