Re: PGP behavior

2000-03-15 Thread Alex Lane
* On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:28:55AM -0600, Alex Lane wrote: > Keeping in mind this is not a PGP mail list, I nonetheless would be > appreciative if anyone could explain why I get a signal 11 error when > running pgp 6.5.2. The mutt docs I've looked at distinguish pgp2 and > pgp5; is 6.5.2 a compl

Re: PGP behavior

2000-03-14 Thread Alex Lane
Keeping in mind this is not a PGP mail list, I nonetheless would be appreciative if anyone could explain why I get a signal 11 error when running pgp 6.5.2. The mutt docs I've looked at distinguish pgp2 and pgp5; is 6.5.2 a completely different animal? I may be taking a oversimplified view of thi

Re: PGP behavior

2000-03-14 Thread Alex Lane
* On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:20:16AM -0600, Alex Lane wrote: > I just got PGP (v. 6.5.2) back on my Linux box, and seem to have > forgotten how it's supposed to work. > > If I write a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask to encrypt and sign it, I get a > prompt for the key ID of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.