On Aug 01, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > I meant that I compiled mutt with '--enable-pop' (...)
>
> Yep, that's what I meant, too ... I never really tried it, so I
> am afraid I can't be of any real help on the technical issues you
> described ...
I'm afraid that the main technical i
Using a large mallet, Charles Cazabon whacked out:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, IIRC, usually it is suggested that you don't use the "built-in" pop
> > capability but a program such as fetchmail instead. But then, using such a
> > program implies running a MTA such as
> > But, IIRC, usually it is suggested that you don't use the "built-in" pop
> > capability but a program such as fetchmail instead. But then, using such a
> > program implies running a MTA such as sendmail or Postfix,
> [...]
>
> Not necessarily. 'getmail' delivers directly to mbox files or Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But, IIRC, usually it is suggested that you don't use the "built-in" pop
> capability but a program such as fetchmail instead. But then, using such a
> program implies running a MTA such as sendmail or Postfix,
[...]
Not necessarily. 'getmail' de
Hi Ken,
> > If you are using the built-in pop support (I am not sure about what you
> > meant with "with pop"), then don't mind reading the rest of this email :).
>
> I meant that I compiled mutt with '--enable-pop' (...)
Yep, that's what I meant, too ... I never really tried it, so I am afraid
Hi Ken,
If you are using the built-in pop support (I am not sure about what you
meant with "with pop"), then don't mind reading the rest of this email :).
Otherwise, and although this might seem trivial to you, I had the same problem
until I found out that my MTA was putting my incoming mail in
