Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jim Breton
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:39:48PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: > (hum, I think I don't get the point on this one) I noticed. ;) The point is, it gives away information that maybe some people don't want to give away. Using a randomly-rotated 3- or 4-character string would be far better than us

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: > > And what's your problem with it being readable by humans ? > > I already explained why, several messages ago in my response to Thomas. You know someone counting how many messages you wr

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jim Breton
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: > And what's your problem with it being readable by humans ? I already explained why, several messages ago in my response to Thomas.

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: > > RFC 822: > > [...] > > This identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily > > meaningful to humans. > > [...] > > > > That says it all ;) > > No, it doesn't. > > Th

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jim Breton
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: > RFC 822: > [...] > This identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily > meaningful to humans. > [...] > > That says it all ;) No, it doesn't. The problem is that it currently _IS_ meaningful to humans. If it

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > > I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue, > > > > Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get > > proper threading with message copies mutt may wri

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jim Breton
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:59:52PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue, > > Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get > proper threading with message copies mutt may write to folders while > sending. Actually, you're r

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2001-03-23 06:16:39 +, Jim Breton wrote: > I'm re-writing my Message-ID headers using qmail-queue, Why are you doing such things? You'll ruin the possibility to get proper threading with message copies mutt may write to folders while sending. > If I use my_hdr to add a Message-ID header