On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 06:56:13PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> Stupidest solution possible - set edit-headers :)
Which is exactly what I use to solve this same kind of problem.
Hi Matt, small world :)
greg k-h
greg@(kroah|wirex).com
> Mikko Hänninen:
> Well, I guess you could do a script that reads the message-to-be-replied
> to, writes a template reply email out to a file, and then this could be
> used with the resend-message (or edit-postponed) in Mutt as a basis of
> the new email... It would work, but you'd be taking al
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 20 May 2000:
>> there's always the possibility to pipe the mess thru some external program,
>> either in the editor or perhaps with some construct involving ":source
>> |".
>
>How does that help in the sit
clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 20 May 2000:
> there's always the possibility to pipe the mess thru some external program,
> either in the editor or perhaps with some construct involving ":source
> |".
How does that help in the situation we were discussing?
Well, I guess you could do
> Mikko Hänninen:
> > I guess what I'm basically looking for is a reply-hook. Something that I
> > can use to change things based on the message I'm replying to. Does
> > anything like that exist?
>
> Nope, sorry. There's been talk of ways to solve this, and I think even
> the best way has be
Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 19 May 2000:
> > Nope, sorry. There's been talk of ways to solve this, and I think even
> > the best way has been figured out (creating a pseudo-operator which tells
> > that the next pattern operator should match against the headers of the
> > repl
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 11:20:09PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 18 May 2000:
>
> > (2) I'm _replying_ to mail that was sent to a mailing list. This is the
> > tough case -- the To: field is some other random address, and the list
> > isn'
Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 18 May 2000:
> Okay.. I've searched the mailing list archives for this, but it seems that
> I'm the only person trying to do exactly this, and I can't seem to make
> mutt do it. Perhaps some of you out there can help.
Maybe. :-)
> Basically, I wan
