I left out one crucial constraint: I'm reading the mutt-users digest
via IMAP, so it never gets locally delivered by procmail. I wrote a
little perl script that runs formail while "preserving" some of the
headers in the digest (like "sender"). But that's an ugly solution
and I thought someone mi
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 21:44]:
> I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual
> messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and
> "Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have
> anything unique that procmail can
I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual
messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and
"Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have
anything unique that procmail can use to identify them as being from
mutt-users. Other list's dige
* Duke Normandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 22:19]:
> I'm currently subscribed to various mailing lists that include the
> messages as "attachments" -- so it's trivial to reply to an single
> message/thread. However, the mutt-users-digest "includes" all the
> messages into one message. How do yo
