Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-15 Thread Rich Lafferty
Quoting Fairlight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 07:23:03PM -0400: > > This thread's got me interested. I've been using exim with mutt since, > > oh, mutt 0.8something, at least. (I switched to both at the same time.) > > I've never had a problem. Regarding "--": > > > > > > > So

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-15 Thread edmundo
> So I'd suggest, as a real fix, you complain to the exim developpers > so they support "--" as "stop option parsing here", which is the > usual Unix convention. Before anyone does complain, can I just point out that it appears to have been fixed already for at least 10 months: $ /usr/sbin/send

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-15 Thread Fairlight
> This thread's got me interested. I've been using exim with mutt since, > oh, mutt 0.8something, at least. (I switched to both at the same time.) > I've never had a problem. Regarding "--": > > > So it doesn't appear to be a "mutt problem" or an "exim problem", but > an "unusual behavior at on

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-15 Thread Rich Lafferty
Quoting Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 08:02:04PM +0200: > The attached patch may help to solve your problem. But note that > with that patch applied, exim may interpret e-mail addresses which > begin with "-" as command line aguments. > > So I'd suggest, as a real

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-15 Thread Thomas Roessler
The attached patch may help to solve your problem. But note that with that patch applied, exim may interpret e-mail addresses which begin with "-" as command line aguments. So I'd suggest, as a real fix, you complain to the exim developpers so they support "--" as "stop option parsing here", wh

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-13 Thread Fairlight
> > The PROBLEM is that mutt is somehow (someWHY) invoking sendmail/exim > > with the actual argument "--" ...And that's what exim is puking on. > One solution would be to create a sendmail script that looks for and > eats the "--" argument, then launches exim with the new command line. Kludgy

Re: Exim vs. Mutt (Round 1)

1999-08-13 Thread David DeSimone
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The PROBLEM is that mutt is somehow (someWHY) invoking sendmail/exim > with the actual argument "--" ...And that's what exim is puking on. One solution would be to create a sendmail script that looks for and eats the "--" argument, then launches exim with