On 2000-05-27 21:49:21 -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
> Ah. So the issue is the sender, in this case
> presumably Lotus Notes.
Yes, it is, and it is complete and utter brain-damage on
Lotus' side. For some kind of handler, you may try the
attached shell script, which helps at least in some
situat
On 05/27/00, 09:16:03PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % The attachments are preceded by the following text:
> %
> % UUEncoded file named: 1073313B.doc follows)
> % (Its format is: Lotus Manuscript 1.0 )
>
> Here's your answer: instead of having been encoded with a modern MIME
> method (base64 o
John --
...and then John P. Verel said...
% I've received a couple of attachments which are MS Word in format.
Well, they are MS Word documents, but they have been encoded for mailing.
% They were forwarded to me by another recipient.
That's where it always starts ;-)
%
% The attachments
