* Derek Martin [2011-03-15 09:42 -0500]:
> Actually, do either of these last two messages (this one, and the one
> I'm replying to) verify correctly? I upgraded OpenSSL, and now I see
> this:
>
> $ gpg --list-packets foo4.txt
> :signature packet: algo 17, keyid 1C49C048DFBEAD02
> version
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:34:37AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> Actually, do either of these last two messages (this one, and the one
> I'm replying to) verify correctly? I upgraded OpenSSL, and now I see
> this:
>
> $ gpg --list-packets foo4.txt
> :signature packet: algo 17, keyid 1C49C048DFBEAD0
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:25:47AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:28:21AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > If this verifies, I just figured it out.
> >
> > Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has any
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:28:21AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > If this verifies, I just figured it out.
>
> Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has anything to do with the
> fact that your signature is 159 bits, and not 160
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:48:26PM +0100, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> Possibly... but it consistently is with only Derek's emails. Your
> signature validates fine for example.
>
> Using mutt and gpg as available in / from Debian Squeeze.
It’s not just you as I am seeing it too, with both gpg and gpg2
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> If this verifies, I just figured it out.
Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has anything to do with the
fact that your signature is 159 bits, and not 160?
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> If this verifies, I just figured it out.
It's still failing in Mutt for me, but verifies in Thunderbird.
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
signatur
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:28:56PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I've tried to contact you about this outside this list, but you
> > don't make it very easy for people to contact you directly.
>
> Indeed I don't... An artefact of spam prevention strategy in a
> previous life.
Is it as simple as
Quoth Derek Martin on Monday, 14 March 2011:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:11:06PM +0100, Remark Rijnders wrote:
> > I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each
> > and every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure
> > whether you are aware of this or not.
>
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 03:11:41PM +0100, Richard wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:32:54AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > Something must be broken with your MUA or OpenPGP implementation. All of
> > his signatures come in clean for me. I haven't seen a bad signature from
> > him on this list.
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:11:06PM +0100, Remark Rijnders wrote:
> I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each
> and every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure
> whether you are aware of this or not.
You're not the first to mention it to me, but I've also
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:32:54AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 03/13/2011 06:11 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> > Derek,
> >
> > I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each and
> > every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure whether
> > you are aware of th
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:32:54AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 03/13/2011 06:11 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> > Derek,
> >
> > I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each and
> > every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure whether
> > you are aware of th
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:32:54AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On 03/13/2011 06:11 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Derek,
I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each and
every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure whether
you are aware of this or not.
I've tr
On 03/13/2011 06:11 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> Derek,
>
> I do appreciate you signing all your mails to this list, but each and
> every one of them shows up as a bad signature and I'm not sure whether
> you are aware of this or not.
>
> I've tried to contact you about this outside this list, but
15 matches
Mail list logo
