On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:23:43PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I
> don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your
> advice are very useful for me.
This too, you can do, as long as you have enough space in your hom
Thanks All!
The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I
don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your
advice are very useful for me.
Thank you very much.
Zhang Qi
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway
wrote:
> Nathan
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:35:05 +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:22:43 -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
> As others have indicated in their examples, you don't need to prefix
> each file with "-a". Use "--" to separate the list of at
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:28:47PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then
only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a
file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right?
As others have indicated in their examples, you
On Wed, May 12, 2010 8:51 am, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
>> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
>> different folders.
>> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
>
> If I understand correctly, this is tri
Thank you Mr DM
But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then
only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a
file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right?
So I made a script can store all file names in one list and begins
with "-a", then use:
mutt
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
If I understand correctly, this is trivial to do with mutt in a
script, unless your attachment f
My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4
If I use -a option, everything goes well. But I should write more bash
scripts on how many attaments for each receiver, with the file name
and email address.
Zhang Qi
2010/5/12 bill lam :
> Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option whic
Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option which will generate
proper mime-compliant header?
Срд, 12 Май 2010, Qi Zhang писал(а):
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
> redirect mail a
Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
different folders.
Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
redirect mail attachments to a single file is more easy than use "-a
file1 file2"
I plan to use mail -s "Subject" recei...@example.com < att.email (This
attachme
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
# code
uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
cat mail_message >> att.email
mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
with this script, I can send email with attachment very easy.
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I meet with a problem sending emails with attachements by mutt.
> simplly like this:
>
> # code
> uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
>
> cat mail_message >> att.email
>
> mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
>
>
> with this
Hello,
I meet with a problem sending emails with attachements by mutt.
simplly like this:
# code
uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
cat mail_message >> att.email
mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
with this script, I can send email with attachment very easy. and
gmail
13 matches
Mail list logo
