Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-02 04:40:58 CEST] wrote:
...
%
% > You mentioned your non-standard config;
% > where did you get your mutt itself?
%
% I think I mentioned it before, but the query-feature from
% the unstable branch (wh
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020601 23:22]:
>
>he probably got mutt from some linux distribution
>which mucks around with the setup files. *hrmpf*
>
Actually, it's based off of Chris Gushue's .muttrc, with a fair amount
of changes of my own.
>
>you mean, "TOFU" (text oben, full-quote unte
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02 03:14]:
> I've heard lots of things about heavily patched SuSe kernels
> (... and people suggesting not to use them) and SuSe at all.
oh, SuSE... right.
> Allthough I never used it I would say that SuSe makes lots
> of changes to sources before they
* David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02]:
> % Apparently mutt is still reading in values from /etc/Muttrc, and
> % something in there is causing this to happen. The fast_reply option is
> % turned off in both my config and the /etc/Muttrc. If anyone is bored
> That doesn't make
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-02 04:40:58 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Kyle Knack said...
> % Apparently mutt is still reading in values from /etc/Muttrc, and
> % something in there is causing this to happen. The fast_reply option is
> % turned off in both my config and the /etc/Muttrc. If anyone is
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020601 22:44]:
>Do you have
>
> #set fast_reply
>
>or
>
> set nofast_reply
>
>in either of your muttrc files? It's unlikely, but perhaps it was
>compiled in as "on" by default. You mentioned your non-standard config;
>where did you get your mutt itself?
>
It tu
Kyle --
...and then Kyle Knack said...
%
% And, as it always turns out, as soon as I sent that, I figured it out.
Sort of, I think.
% Apparently mutt is still reading in values from /etc/Muttrc, and
% something in there is causing this to happen. The fast_reply option is
% turned off in both
gt; vi.
>>
>>Sounds like $fast_reply is set somewhere.
>>
>>> * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020601 03:38]:
>>> >Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:36:52 +0200
>>> >From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >To:
03:38]:
>> >Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:36:52 +0200
>> >From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Cc: Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Subject: Re: Problem composing mail since switching to SuSE
>> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
>Mind explaining why you quote this? IMHO it's completely
>useless...
>
>Cheers, Rocco
>
--
Kyle Knack
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IL PROTECTED]> [020601 03:38]:
> >Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:36:52 +0200
> >From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Cc: Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Problem composing mail since switching to SuSE
>
TECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Problem composing mail since switching to SuSE
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
>* Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-31 23:48:21 -0400]:
>> I recently switched my workstati
* Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-31 23:48:21 -0400]:
> I recently switched my workstation from RedHat 7.1 to SuSE 7.3, and
> now I'm having a funny problem when I compose mail. Mutt is no longer
> asking me for a recipient or CC address when I hit 'm' to compose mail
> (ask for CC i
Hi guys,
I recently switched my workstation from RedHat 7.1 to SuSE 7.3, and
now I'm having a funny problem when I compose mail. Mutt is no longer
asking me for a recipient or CC address when I hit 'm' to compose mail
(ask for CC is explicitly turned on in my config). My configuration is
fa
13 matches
Mail list logo
