Re: Setting postponed in folder hook (possible bug)

2010-02-24 Thread Rado S
Moin, =- James TD Smith wrote on Tue 23.Feb'10 at 22:35:19 + -= > When I start mutt, it comes up in the inbox for my personal > account, and the correct number of postponed messages is displayed > in the statusbar. If I open another folder within the same > account, the postponed count stays

Setting postponed in folder hook (possible bug)

2010-02-23 Thread James TD Smith
Having recently got a new laptop, I've started using offlineimap to download mail from my personal and work accounts so I can read my mail when I'm offline. I've followed the instructions in the offlineimap man page for handling multiple accounts with mutt, and everything is working perfectly exce

possible bug with colors on page view

2007-12-18 Thread Javier Rojas
Hi, When I change the textwidth in the pager view (the 'wrap' option) the text coloring isn't updated properly. E.g., if I open an email like this: yadda yadda yadda yadda lalalala la a [EMAIL PROTECTED] lala yadda ^^^ yadda yadda lalala where the underlined text is colored

Possible bug

2000-09-11 Thread Jens Askengren
Hello I was trying to make each key bind to the same functions in every menu when I discovered this (bug?): # This works as expected macro index I "!\n" "Goto Inbox" # This produces an error when "I" is pressed macro browser I "!\n" "Goto Inbox" # I added this line by mistake

Re: possible bug?

2000-06-21 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:20:07PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > This morning I received a message which had 130 recipients (myself > > included) all in the To: header. I wanted to send my reply to all 130 > > recipients, so I used the 'g' key to do a group-reply. However, after > > composing

Re: possible bug?

2000-06-21 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000: > This morning I received a message which had 130 recipients (myself > included) all in the To: header. I wanted to send my reply to all 130 > recipients, so I used the 'g' key to do a group-reply. However, after > composing my message,

possible bug?

2000-06-21 Thread Anand Buddhdev
I'm using mutt on Redhat linux 6.2: Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09) Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details

Possible bug in $ with IMAP

2000-04-12 Thread Ben Beuchler
I'm experiencing an oddity when I use mutt with IMAP: After I mark some files for deletion, I hit '$' to synchronize the changes and get the deleted messages off my screen. When this happens, ALL of the messages disappear from the index until either new mail arrives, I change folders and then ch

Re: Possible bug/feature involving PGP

1999-12-01 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-11-30 22:42:19 -0500, David W. Bettis wrote: > # create a pgp/mime encrypted attachment > set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgp +verbose=1 +encrypttoself +batchmode -eaft %r < %f" You may wish to set verbose to zero. Additionally, you may wish to switch on pgp2 compatibility mode (+compatib

Re: Possible bug/feature involving PGP

1999-11-30 Thread David Ellement
On 991130, at 22:42:19, David W. Bettis wrote: > [...] I've had problems trying to > send out encrypted messages with another person's public key. When > trying to send a message to myself, here is what I get: > > Key can sign. > WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a truste

Possible bug/feature involving PGP

1999-11-30 Thread David W. Bettis
Greetings, all. Just recently, I've been messing around with PGP, trying to get everything set up correctly, and such. I've had problems trying to send out encrypted messages with another person's public key. When trying to send a message to myself, here is what I get: Pretty Good Privacy(tm)

Re: forward email as attachment? (possible bug found!)

1999-08-06 Thread Robert Chien
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 12:00:12AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > > If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of > > works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+ > > emails. Would be nice if I can presss