I'm using mutt on Redhat linux 6.2:
Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.
System: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 [using slang 10202]
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
+DEBUG
-HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID -USE_DOTLOCK +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK
+USE_IMAP +USE_GSS -USE_SSL +USE_POP +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX
+HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_PGP -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS +ENABLE_NLS
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="/var/spool/mail"
SHAREDIR="/etc"
SYSCONFDIR="/etc"
-ISPELL
To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To report a bug, please use the muttbug utility.
This morning I received a message which had 130 recipients (myself
included) all in the To: header. I wanted to send my reply to all 130
recipients, so I used the 'g' key to do a group-reply. However, after
composing my message, I noticed that the composer had only put the
sender's address into the To: header for the reply. The message had
a Reply-To: header, pointing back to the sender. I double checked my
settings, and my "reply_to" variable is set to "ask-yes". Mutt should
have asked me what address I wanted to use for replies. Instead it went
ahead and used the Reply-To: address, with the result that I cannot
reply to all the recipients. Is this a bug, or am I missing something?
--
See complete headers for more info
