* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.44 +0100]:
[...SNIP...]
> > Now it works, I have to use %Z instead of %z.
> > attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %Z}]:"
>
> Stupid me, of course I want
> attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z}]:"
>
> Nicolas (who should go to bed no
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:38:15 +0100]:
> * Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]:
> > * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> > > * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> > > I tried:
> > >
* Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]:
> * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> > * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> > I tried:
> > attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %z}]:"
>
> Why not set the date-part i
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> I tried:
> attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %z}]:"
Why not set the date-part in $date_format, like so:
set attribution="* %n <%a> [%d]:"
and
* Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> * John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 06:01 -0600]:
> > Oh, I definitely agree that the ISO format is the way to go. Although
> > I would change it a bit since technically the hyphens (-) are
> > unnecessary due to the f
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 06:01 -0600]:
> Oh, I definitely agree that the ISO format is the way to go. Although
> I would change it a bit since technically the hyphens (-) are
> unnecessary due to the fields being fixed-length, but that's a bigger
> nitpick than even I am w
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, 15:05, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > 2002-01-02
> >
> > If we know this is ISO, then obviously it's "January 2, 2002". But if
> > we're not _sure_ it's ISO, then it could be "February 1, 2002".
> Nah. Not even someone who had never even _heard_ of ISO would ever
> write
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:58:57AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0500, "N. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:01:28AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
> >
> >> That being said, in practice it is probably a good bet 9 times out of
> >> 10
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0500, "N. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:01:28AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
>
>> That being said, in practice it is probably a good bet 9 times out of
>> 10 that if you see a date like -xx-xx it is probaby -MM-DD...
>
>I
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:01:28AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
> That being said, in practice it is probably a good bet 9 times out of
> 10 that if you see a date like -xx-xx it is probaby -MM-DD...
Interesting... In what situation would -XX-XX ever be confused with
-DD-MM inste
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:34:10PM +0100, Gerhard Häring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Le 13/03/02 à 05:20, John Buttery écrivit:
>> Even the ISO format is somewhat lacking in this regard, since although
>> it is ambiguous in a vacuum, the fact is that people may not _know_ you
>> are using that f
Le 13/03/02 à 05:20, John Buttery écrivit:
> Even the ISO format is somewhat lacking in this regard, since although
> it is ambiguous in a vacuum, the fact is that people may not _know_ you
> are using that format and so there is still ambiguity, although not a
> failing of the format itself.
T
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:36:22AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
>* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-Maerz-13 09:04]:
>> Post 1999 you are adding to this confusion since the 2
>> digit year could also be interpreted as a month for the
>> next 10 years, and as a day for the next 29... and yymmdd,
* Simon "english rules" White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-Maerz-13 09:04]:
> 13-Mar-02 at 09:35, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > I started using "[yymmdd]" as a date indicator on my webpages
> > before Markus Kuhn wrote ISO-8601 (in 1995) - so sue me! ;-)
> Well, that's no excuse for no
14 matches
Mail list logo
