Alas! Aaron Schrab spake thus:
> > > macro index d N "delete the
>current entry"
> >
> > Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
> > that isn't new? ;)
>
> No, clear-flag does exactly that, it clears flags. It should be pretty
> easy to check this out, since by d
At 03:01 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
> > at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion.
>
> True. How do I do this, then?
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
> at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion.
True. How do I do this, then? I have tried to few things, but
nothing seems to work correctly.
Thanks.
Previously, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
% > > macro index d N "delete the current entry"
% ...
% > macro index d N "delete the
current entry"
%
% Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
% that isn't new? ;)
No, the clear flag just cle
At 00:47 -0700 07 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
> > macro index d N "delete the
>current entry"
>
> Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
> that isn't new? ;)
No, clear-flag does exactly that, it clears f
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > macro index d N "delete the
>current entry"
>
> Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
> that isn't new? ;)
No, N just seems to clear the 'N' flag if it exists. If
not, it does nothing, other than preceding to t
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
> > macro index d N "delete the current entry"
...
> macro index d N "delete the current
>entry"
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"I'm glad I'm not bisexual. I coul
At 02:15 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> macro index d N "delete the current
>entry"
That won't work properly on the last message in a mailbox.
> since I have $resolve set to yes. :)
It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
at the begi
On Sun, Jan 6, 2002, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
> Previously, Ken Weingold wrote:
> % Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
> % status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
> % that?
>
> Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it ye
Previously, Ken Weingold wrote:
% Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
% status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
% that?
Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet. The way
around it would be something like this:
macr
Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
that?
Thanks.
-Ken
11 matches
Mail list logo
