On 2000-02-03 18:13:53 -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> When I reply, the orginal mail's content gets quoted followed by
> the signature, and the cursor is set on the first line above the
> quoted reply. There was some discussion in the past that the old
> mail should be followed by the new.
I'd sugges
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 06:13:53PM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> What is the current recommended approach to reply formats?
I, personally, can't stand it when someone replies above the quoted
text. It makes it difficult to follow the flow of the discussion.
The only time I really find that acceptab
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:51:25AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately the Windows (or graphical? to avoid Windows-antibias)
> email clients don't quite follow this line of thinking in their editors.
> I can understand the logic that "your own text should be placed in front
> of
Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Feb 2000:
> Has anyone implemented automatic solution to include the new
> mail+signature at the top followed by the quoted reply?
Mutt (deliberately) doesn't support this, not even as an option. To
get Mutt behave like that would require patching.
When I reply, the orginal mail's content gets quoted followed by
the signature, and the cursor is set on the first line above the
quoted reply. There was some discussion in the past that the old
mail should be followed by the new.
Has anyone implemented automatic solution to include the new
mail
