Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread brian moore
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:51:17PM -0500, Scott V. McGuire wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:29:21PM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote: > > 2000-01-13-14:27:28 Scott V. McGuire: > > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It > > > seems like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail)

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > > when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:54:30PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > > when all I need is a program to l

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread David DeSimone
Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately > send mail to my isp's smtp server. Wh

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately > send mail to my isp's smtp server. T

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:29:21PM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote: > 2000-01-13-14:27:28 Scott V. McGuire: > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It > > seems like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single > > user system when all I need is a program to look like sen

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-01-13-14:27:28 Scott V. McGuire: > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It > seems like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single > user system when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but > immediately send mail to my isp's smtp server. That's eas

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 12:59:31PM -0600, Jeffrey L . Taylor wrote: > I bypass the MTA for incoming mail. I've added > > mda "/usr/local/bin/maildrop -f %F" > > to my .fetchmailrc file for each POP mailbox. I don't know if this > works with procmail. > > HTH, > Jeffrey > Any ideas on not