Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail [OT request]

2001-03-27 Thread Tim Whitehead
Thanks to all those who responded. How about this: I want the X-Operating-System to report Linux 2.4.2 i686 up 3 days, 16 hours, 08 minutes: 3 users; ave load:' and then have the average of the 5 minute 10 minute and the fifteen minute loads. Inline command or script would be cool. thanks,

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Tony Collins
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:54:15PM -0500, Wade A. Mosely wrote: > I use: > > my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -smr` `uptime | sed s/.*up/up/ \ >| sed s/,[[:space:]0-9]*users.*$//` > > It's probably clumsy, but it works! =) I don't mind how dodgy it looks, it works

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Wade A. Mosely
Tony Collins wrote: > Completely off-topic, I notice that your X-Operating-System header contains > the kernel version and the uptime. What have you got in your .muttrc to > make it put these things in your headers? I use: my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -smr` `uptime | sed s/.*up/up/ \

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail [OT request]

2001-03-26 Thread Tim Whitehead
There should not be a space between `` because uptime includes a space. Actually I wish uptime had better formatting. They have two spaces before the amount of users and two spaces before load average (as well as a few others). If there is a way to remedy this, I'd be much obliged. Maybe if I k

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Tony Collins
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:23:42AM -0500, Wade A. Mosely wrote: Completely off-topic, I notice that your X-Operating-System header contains the kernel version and the uptime. What have you got in your .muttrc to make it put these things in your headers? Re Tony -- Is that an African or Europ

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:09:22AM -0500, Wade A. Mosely wrote: > Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > Well, passing the message to a very simple one line script seems > > > to work. I made a ~/.mutt/mailout (mode +x to make it > > > executable): > > > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > cat | procm

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Lars Hecking
> > [Splutter] Useless Use of cat. > > > > > > Thanks, Lars, for that marvelously helpful comment. I didn't > find any better solution on my own, though. There is none. The problem, as you stated correctly, is that mutt passes sender and recipient addresses to $sendmail on the command l

Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Wade A. Mosely
Lars Hecking wrote: > > > Well, passing the message to a very simple one line script seems > > to work. I made a ~/.mutt/mailout (mode +x to make it > > executable): > > > > #!/bin/sh > > cat | procmail ~/.procoutrc > > # End of ~/.mutt/mailout > > > [Splutter] Usele

Re: Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Wade A. Mosely
BTW, one of the main things I am trying to accomplish is changing the recipient headers ("To:", "Cc:", "Bcc:") in outgoing messages Based upon their contents. Send-hooks don't seem to work to do this. >From /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt : "... note that my_hdr commands which modify recipient he

Mutt, procmail, and sendmail

2001-03-26 Thread Wade A. Mosely
I want to use procmail to do some pre-processing of outgoing mail before sending. I have created an rcfile for procmail that does what I want called ~/.procoutrc which does the processing I want using formail and passes the mail to sendmail for sending. It works as I expect and want if I