Re: Mutt's hooks and their logic

2002-06-16 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:18:51PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > I wanted to ask about different hooks and their logic. Here's and > example of a send-hook: > But I was just wondering about the logic Muttþ uses with hooks. > Shouldn't that be plain obvious with that first send-hook, that *only*

Re: Mutt's hooks and their logic

2002-06-11 Thread David T-G
Jussi -- ...and then Jussi Ekholm said... % ... % But I was just wondering about the logic Muttþ uses with hooks. It all depends. No, really! Some hooks can be applied more than once, so mutt reads all of those definitions and applies the union of the sets. Some hooks can only be applied onc

Mutt's hooks and their logic

2002-06-11 Thread Jussi Ekholm
I wanted to ask about different hooks and their logic. Here's and example of a send-hook: send-hook '~t ^foo\.bar@baz\.qux$' 'set signature=~/.sigs/sig.foo' This, at least, *should* add ~/.sigs/sig.foo to all mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - and that it does. But on the flip-side, it adds t