Re: I've broken something

2002-04-13 Thread David T-G
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Quoting David T-G, Wed Apr 10 14:12:05 -0500 2002 (CEST) % % > BTW, isn't your clock a bit off? Your message said 10:42 +0200 but it % > certainly doesn't look like that when I peek outside... % % It is... as you could see I can break many t

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-13 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Quoting David T-G, Wed Apr 10 14:12:05 -0500 2002 (CEST) > Rafael -- > BTW, isn't your clock a bit off? Your message said 10:42 +0200 but it > certainly doesn't look like that when I peek outside... It is... as you could see I can break many things. I played hard with the mainboard settings, b

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-13 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Quoting David T-G, Thu Apr 11 11:42:32 -0500 2002 (CEST) > % rgawenda is UID,GID=3D0 > Whoa -- rgawenda is your root user? Sort of it, some Debian packages required 'root' to exist, so I just disabled it's login, and created another account with UID=3D0, but the user account ais is the one I us

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread David T-G
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST) % % > Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if % > it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. % % FYI: % It was (of course) my fault,

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread David T-G
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002) % % > Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you % > just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use % > mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking it

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST) > Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if > it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. FYI: It was (of course) my fault, and it was a simple config mistake... Many thanks to all who have

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002) > Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you > just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use > mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking itself, does the proper binary > have the permissions to do so?

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread darren chamberlain
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 09:27]: > * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]: > > If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session: > > strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt > > Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output > files.

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-11 Thread John Buttery
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]: > If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session: > strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output files...saved me a lot of headaches. Just name the file *.strace and ope

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread darren chamberlain
* Rafael C. Gawenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:07]: > Quoting darren chamberlain (Wed Apr 10 14:55:03 CEST 2002) > > Are permissions correct on $MAIL? > > r-x 11 ais ais 1024 Apr 10 10:36 mail I'm not sure what this is indicating; try /bin/ls -l $MAIL > It's weird! I'll

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread David T-G
Rafael -- BTW, isn't your clock a bit off? Your message said 10:42 +0200 but it certainly doesn't look like that when I peek outside... :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread David T-G
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Hi there. Hello! % % Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first % option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a % message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, th

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Quoting darren chamberlain (Wed Apr 10 14:55:03 CEST 2002) > Is the spool directory mounted via NFS? No > Are permissions correct on $MAIL? r-x 11 ais ais 1024 Apr 10 10:36 mail > Is /var some kind of strange partition type? No, it's on the / fs > Are you (accidentally) open

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread Rob Reid
At 4:25 AM EDT on April 10 Rafael C. Gawenda sent off: > Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first > option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a > message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, the > msg is still ther

Re: I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread darren chamberlain
* Rafael C. Gawenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 14:50]: > Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the > first option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), > read a message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I > reenter, the msg is still

I've broken something

2002-04-10 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Hi there. Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, the msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as Ne