* Derek Martin [05-15-14 11:56]:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Stanley Dziegiel wrote:
>
> > The second one will require me to work out how many days worth of e-mails
> > I want to keep, and I a cannot guarantee to get that right when I have to
> > start using my toes...
>
> To cou
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Stanley Dziegiel wrote:
> The second one will require me to work out how many days worth of e-mails
> I want to keep, and I a cannot guarantee to get that right when I have to
> start using my toes...
To count days? Or is there something about your e-mai
> > Is there a way to specify the current message number? If I can find that
> > I can hide it all behind a macro.
>
> It seems that the requirement is either deletion of "unread stuff", or
> "old stuff", too stale to be worth reading. (Even if the two are nearly
> the same in this case)
>
> If
On 12.05.14 09:30, Stanley Dziegiel wrote:
> Is there a way to specify the current message number? If I can find that
> I can hide it all behind a macro.
It seems that the requirement is either deletion of "unread stuff", or
"old stuff", too stale to be worth reading. (Even if the two are nearly
I have been struggling with this for a while and wondered if anybody has
already solved this.
I have many mailboxes where I automatically save mail e.g. apache-users.
I tend to read them when I have time. I have the newest mails at the top
and start reading from there downwards. After a while I w
