On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 02:07:35PM EST, Ed Blackman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:07:40AM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> >Firing up an xterm (or creating a new gnu/screen window) .. firing up
> >another instance of mutt .. drilling down to the particular message I
> >need .. having gnu/scree
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:07:40AM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
Firing up an xterm (or creating a new gnu/screen window) .. firing up
another instance of mutt .. drilling down to the particular message I
need .. having gnu/screen do a screen split .. bringing up the other
instance of mutt in sai
On 2009-01-03, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, January 2 at 02:16 PM, quoth Gary Johnson:
> > Wrong. I can do that now. Using multiple mutts to access one
> > mailbox has the problem that each instance of mutt has its own idea
> > of the status of each message and that status can't currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 2 at 02:16 PM, quoth Gary Johnson:
> Wrong. I can do that now. Using multiple mutts to access one
> mailbox has the problem that each instance of mutt has its own idea
> of the status of each message and that status can't curren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, January 3 at 12:07 AM, quoth Chris Jones:
> No, I'm talking about being able to display/scroll a couple of
> related messages that I would like to refer to..
... which you can do with multiple mutts.
> or possibly copy/paste from..
..
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:53:54PM EST, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, January 2 at 04:18 PM, quoth Chris Jones:
> > Since I wasn't blessed with photographic memory, the only thing
> > that's missing in mutt's interface as far as I am concerned is some
> > form of screen-splitting capablity that
On 2009-01-02, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, January 2 at 04:18 PM, quoth Chris Jones:
> > Since I wasn't blessed with photographic memory, the only thing
> > that's missing in mutt's interface as far as I am concerned is some
> > form of screen-splitting capablity that would let me display/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 2 at 04:18 PM, quoth Chris Jones:
> Since I wasn't blessed with photographic memory, the only thing
> that's missing in mutt's interface as far as I am concerned is some
> form of screen-splitting capablity that would let me displ
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:15:13PM EST, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:05:54PM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> > To all .. and M. Elkins in particular.
>
> Thanks! A Happy New Year to you as well.
Thanks.
> It's nice knowing that people still find Mut
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:15:13PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> It's nice knowing that people still find Mutt useful after 11 years. :-)
I think I need a few more fingers and toes to count with. 2009-1995=14. oops.
me
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:05:54PM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> To all .. and M. Elkins in particular.
Thanks! A Happy New Year to you as well.
It's nice knowing that people still find Mutt useful after 11 years. :-)
me
* Chris Jones [01.01.09 16:07]:
> To all .. and M. Elkins in particular.
>
* Ciò letto, correndo giovedì 01 gennaio 2009, alle 16 e 24 rispondo così:
Happy New Year to all we, mutters :-)
Ataualpa aka Francesco Ciattaglia.
--
oOoOo Di fronte ad un potenziale cliente il segreto per v
To all .. and M. Elkins in particular.
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
> > > Happy 2002 to you all!
> >
> > Lets hope it turns out better than the last one!
>
> Why? Did something bad happen in 2002BC?
Yeah, that was a bad year for me. It was right near the end of the stone
age, and all these bronze tools were created. It was obvio
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:26:46AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > Happy 2002 to you all!
>
> Lets hope it turns out better than the last one!
Why? Did something bad happen in 2002BC?
--
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg22087/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Alas! René Clerc spake thus:
> | % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
> | % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of
> | % you get to party (hopefully) :)
>
> Trust me, I did!
Lucky you... eight hours of work all I managed to do w
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 22:48]:
| % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
| % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of
| % you get to party (hopefully) :)
Trust me, I did!
| Oh, quit your whining -- you know you'
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you,
> mutt wouldn't be the program it is.
And thanks to you, Thomas, for keeping all of us sane, though email
anyway
-Ken
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
% network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of
% you get to party (hopefully) :)
Oh, quit your whining -- you know you're in hog heaven :-)
Happy Holidays to
Alas! Thomas Roessler spake thus:
> Folks,
>
> a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you,
> mutt wouldn't be the program it is.
To you as well!
Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
network of Linux and Windows boxen wor
Folks,
a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you,
mutt wouldn't be the program it is.
. .. .
. ° .
°. .°
\~/
21 matches
Mail list logo
