On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 07:06:14PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:45:04PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I'll try to narrow this down further by trying a very short list of
mailing list names.
After a bit of chopping and changing the list of addresses in 'lists'
I finally spo
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:45:04PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> I'll try to narrow this down further by trying a very short list of
> mailing list names.
>
After a bit of chopping and changing the list of addresses in 'lists'
I finally spotted my problem. Totally my fault, my program that
gener
OK, I now know what was working (in 1.10.1) and now isn't working the
way it did.
If I put the following in my muttrc:-
lists mutt-users@mutt.org
subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org
Then my send-hooks setting a different From: for mutt-users@mutt.org
work as expected in both 1.10.1 and 2.1.4.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:00:28AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> >> It's working in my simple testing, so perhaps there is something more
> >> involved. Can you
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
It's working in my simple testing, so perhaps there is something more
involved. Can you create a small reproducing muttrc file and a list of
exact instructions to trig
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:23:55PM +0100, c...@isbd.net wrote:
> >I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no
> >longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that
> >still runs mutt 1.10.4 an
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:23:55PM +0100, c...@isbd.net wrote:
I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no
longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that
still runs mutt 1.10.4 and there my send-hook/my_hdr configuration
works. It doesn't work on my curre
I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no
longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that
still runs mutt 1.10.4 and there my send-hook/my_hdr configuration
works. It doesn't work on my current mutt 2.1.4.
I see the documentation now says "Also note that
Hi,
RFC2822 defines a possibility to put group names in To/Cc etc ... Format
is described in RFC2828 Section 3.4 Addesss Specification
"
When it is desirable to treat several mailboxes as a single unit
(i.e., in a distribution list), the group construct can be used. The
group construct
Hi, there!
When setting
set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'"
and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got
two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar".
When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only
one argument (including the spa
Hi!
When setting
set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'"
and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got
two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar".
When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only
one argument (including the space). O
At 2:21 PM EDT on May 30 Alex Lane sent off:
> I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed
> to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the
> message signature to simply "--".
>
> I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of th
Alex,
(hey there!)
You, Alex Lane, were spotted writing this on Tue, May 30, 2000 at 01:21:32PM -0500:
> I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed
> to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the
> message signature to simply "--".
It's again
I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed
to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the
message signature to simply "--".
I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of the
mailing list remailer, or am I wrong about that?
Chee
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 16 Jan 2000:
> It's been awhile since the patch was last posted, so I'm attaching it
> again (updated to patch cleanly against the latest CVS version).
Thanks, though the old version did patch with just minor offset
complaints against 1.1.2i. :-)
>
At 00:03 +0200 15 Jan 2000, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
> > I do that often. Mut can be configured to don't tag messages as
> > OLD. The line is:
> >
> > set nomark_old
>
> The problem with that is that it makes Mutt lose
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
> I do that often. Mut can be configured to don't tag messages as
> OLD. The line is:
>
> set nomark_old
The problem with that is that it makes Mutt lose the distinction of new
and old, not just stop marking messages as old. (I think.)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 07:32:41PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
> > Hmm, actually, that's a thought. I wonder if it would be possible to come up
> > with a little patch for mutt that, given a preference setting, would do the
> > equival
Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
> Hmm, actually, that's a thought. I wonder if it would be possible to come up
> with a little patch for mutt that, given a preference setting, would do the
> equivalent of "touch -m" if you leave a folder while messages still have the
>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 10:54:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> Did I miss some setting or is there any trick?
No. What I tend to do when I've had a read in a folder and want it to appear
as having received new email after I leave is to pop over to an xterm and do
a "touch -m" o
I haven't been using mutt for a long time yet. So I'm wondering if I
have some setting wrong or the like. In the folder list the 'N' (new)
flag is shown for all folders with new messages. However, once I
open a folder, the 'N' flag goes away in the folder list, no matter
whether I still have unrea
21 matches
Mail list logo