Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 07:06:14PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:45:04PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: I'll try to narrow this down further by trying a very short list of mailing list names. After a bit of chopping and changing the list of addresses in 'lists' I finally spo

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread Chris Green
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:45:04PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I'll try to narrow this down further by trying a very short list of > mailing list names. > After a bit of chopping and changing the list of addresses in 'lists' I finally spotted my problem. Totally my fault, my program that gener

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread Chris Green
OK, I now know what was working (in 1.10.1) and now isn't working the way it did. If I put the following in my muttrc:- lists mutt-users@mutt.org subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org Then my send-hooks setting a different From: for mutt-users@mutt.org work as expected in both 1.10.1 and 2.1.4.

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread cl
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:00:28AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > >> It's working in my simple testing, so perhaps there is something more > >> involved. Can you

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: It's working in my simple testing, so perhaps there is something more involved. Can you create a small reproducing muttrc file and a list of exact instructions to trig

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-10 Thread Chris Green
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:28:00PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:23:55PM +0100, c...@isbd.net wrote: > >I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no > >longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that > >still runs mutt 1.10.4 an

Re: Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-09 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:23:55PM +0100, c...@isbd.net wrote: I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that still runs mutt 1.10.4 and there my send-hook/my_hdr configuration works. It doesn't work on my curre

Has the handling of my_hdr and send_hook changed between 1.10.x and 2.1.4?

2023-04-09 Thread cl
I'm trying to sort out why something that used to work for me no longer works. I just went and tried out an older installation that still runs mutt 1.10.4 and there my send-hook/my_hdr configuration works. It doesn't work on my current mutt 2.1.4. I see the documentation now says "Also note that

Handling of ";" in To: with group nameing

2016-01-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, RFC2822 defines a possibility to put group names in To/Cc etc ... Format is described in RFC2828 Section 3.4 Addesss Specification " When it is desirable to treat several mailboxes as a single unit (i.e., in a distribution list), the group construct can be used. The group construct

query_command handling of '%s' vs. %s

2001-08-30 Thread Volker Moell
Hi, there! When setting set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'" and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar". When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only one argument (including the spa

query_command handling of '%s' vs. %s

2001-08-30 Thread Volker Moell
Hi! When setting set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'" and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar". When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only one argument (including the space). O

Re: Handling of ^-- $

2000-05-30 Thread Rob Reid
At 2:21 PM EDT on May 30 Alex Lane sent off: > I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed > to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the > message signature to simply "--". > > I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of th

Re: Handling of ^-- $

2000-05-30 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
Alex, (hey there!) You, Alex Lane, were spotted writing this on Tue, May 30, 2000 at 01:21:32PM -0500: > I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed > to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the > message signature to simply "--". It's again

Handling of ^-- $

2000-05-30 Thread Alex Lane
I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the message signature to simply "--". I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of the mailing list remailer, or am I wrong about that? Chee

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-16 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 16 Jan 2000: > It's been awhile since the patch was last posted, so I'm attaching it > again (updated to patch cleanly against the latest CVS version). Thanks, though the old version did patch with just minor offset complaints against 1.1.2i. :-) >

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-16 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 00:03 +0200 15 Jan 2000, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000: > > I do that often. Mut can be configured to don't tag messages as > > OLD. The line is: > > > > set nomark_old > > The problem with that is that it makes Mutt lose

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000: > I do that often. Mut can be configured to don't tag messages as > OLD. The line is: > > set nomark_old The problem with that is that it makes Mutt lose the distinction of new and old, not just stop marking messages as old. (I think.)

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-14 Thread Jorge Godoy
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 07:32:41PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000: > > Hmm, actually, that's a thought. I wonder if it would be possible to come up > > with a little patch for mutt that, given a preference setting, would do the > > equival

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000: > Hmm, actually, that's a thought. I wonder if it would be possible to come up > with a little patch for mutt that, given a preference setting, would do the > equivalent of "touch -m" if you leave a folder while messages still have the >

Re: handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-14 Thread Dave Pearson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 10:54:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [SNIP] > > Did I miss some setting or is there any trick? No. What I tend to do when I've had a read in a folder and want it to appear as having received new email after I leave is to pop over to an xterm and do a "touch -m" o

handling of New flag for folders

2000-01-14 Thread Kurt
I haven't been using mutt for a long time yet. So I'm wondering if I have some setting wrong or the like. In the folder list the 'N' (new) flag is shown for all folders with new messages. However, once I open a folder, the 'N' flag goes away in the folder list, no matter whether I still have unrea