On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:03:46PM +0200, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 21:47]:
> > On gentoo at least, gnupg2 gets real pissy when there is no X
> > environment. I don't use it all that much, but memory says that
> > clearing DISPLAY and trying numerou
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> I've recently started looking into gpg-agent again, because it seems
> the redraw issues that used to plague pinentry calls have been
> resolved.
I think there may still be one or two. I found one a few months back
and submitted a patch, but since then I've run into a simila
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 21:47]:
> On gentoo at least, gnupg2 gets real pissy when there is no X
> environment. I don't use it all that much, but memory says that
> clearing DISPLAY and trying numerous other tricks to force a command
> line passphrase input didn't work,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:56:16AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Does anyone here know what the differences between the two are? Why
> gnupg2 is recommended for "desktop" use moreso than gnupg1?
On gentoo at least, gnupg2 gets real pissy when there is no X
environment. I don't use it all that mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I've recently started looking into gpg-agent again, because it seems
the redraw issues that used to plague pinentry calls have been
resolved. In doing so, I discovered that there's now a Gnupg2 (or
rather, 2.0.9) that is available above
