On 08Sep2015 22:36, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2015-09-07 18:50 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
macro index g "" "group reply"
macro pager g "qg" "group reply"
Buried in here is the information that mutt scans for macros
recursively, which is news to me. Still deciding if it is good or bad
new
On 2015-09-07 18:50 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> macro index g "" "group reply"
> macro pager g "qg" "group reply"
Buried in here is the information that mutt scans for macros
recursively, which is news to me. Still deciding if it is good or bad
news, but it's good to know about it :-P
--
On 07Sep2015 10:26, Michael Tatge wrote:
* On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 06:07PM -0700 Ian Zimmerman (i...@buug.org) muttered:
I've had this in .muttrc for a while (along with other bindings starting
with \ca):
macro index,pager \cac "~N" "catch
up"
Until now I always did it from the index, and it wo
* On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 06:07PM -0700 Ian Zimmerman (i...@buug.org) muttered:
> I've had this in .muttrc for a while (along with other bindings starting
> with \ca):
>
> macro index,pager \cac "~N"
> "catch up"
>
> Until now I always did it from the index, and it works flawlessly.
>
> Today I tr
I've had this in .muttrc for a while (along with other bindings starting
with \ca):
macro index,pager \cac "~N" "catch
up"
Until now I always did it from the index, and it works flawlessly.
Today I tried it in the pager for the first time, and of course
something exciting and unexpected happens
