Re: Adding to date header

1999-05-02 Thread Anonymous
++ 21/04/99 17:37 -0500 - David Shaw: >happy among other things). Strictly speaking, the above format is >illegal, so who knows how another mail program will parse it. It is legal (under certain coonditions). See section 3.4.3 of RFC822, somewhere around line 845... -Rejo. -- = Rejo [Si

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-22 Thread David Shaw
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 06:02:38AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 17:37:22 -0500, David Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 04:23:43PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > > > > is it possible to add anything to the date header? > > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-22 Thread homega
Byrial Jensen dixit: ~> > > > ~> > > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 ~> > > >^^ ~> > > ~> > Yes. 822 specified it and 1123 changed the format a little (made it Y2K ~> > happy among other things). Strictly speaking, the above format is

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-22 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 17:03:39 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Frankly, I don't see any need at all to make this > configurable. I totally agree. But one of the avantages with open source is just that you can and may make your own small changes as you like directly in the source if you have som

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-04-21 16:22:23 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and I'd like it to read something like: > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 >^^ > perhaps in a way it calculates current year + 753 (that possibly belongs > to the date_format string, b

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 17:37:22 -0500, David Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 04:23:43PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > > > is it possible to add anything to the date header? > > > > > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 > > >^^ > > >

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread David Shaw
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 04:23:43PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > > is it possible to add anything to the date header? > > > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 > >^^ > > Aren't there RFC requirements about what a Date: header is supposed to

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread David DeSimone
> is it possible to add anything to the date header? > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 >^^ Aren't there RFC requirements about what a Date: header is supposed to look like? -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread homega
Byrial Jensen dixit: ~> ~> It can't be done without changing the source. But fortunately ~> that's rather easy to do in this case. Thanks a lot, but that means I have to recompile... not good at that as yet, I'll keep it for later. ~> BTW what happened 2752 years ago? Don't you remember? ;-)

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread Lars Hecking
> BTW what happened 2752 years ago? Hazarding a guess: Rome was founded/built in 753bc. No idea what "U.c." (as in: 2752 ad U.c.) means, though.

Re: Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 16:22:23 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi there, > > is it possible to add anything to the date header? > > It now reads: > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:36:03 +0200 > > and I'd like it to read something like: > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 >

Adding to date header

1999-04-21 Thread homega
Hi there, is it possible to add anything to the date header? It now reads: Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:36:03 +0200 and I'd like it to read something like: Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 (2752 ad U.c.) 10:36:03 +0200 ^^ perhaps in a way it calculates current year + 753 (