On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 09:58:16AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mh... Did you check whether or not this only occurs when
> you start up mutt, or also when you change folders?
Also when I change folders.
Cheers,
-Ives
__
Ives
On 2000-07-12 09:44:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
> Mmm... more than 4 seconds to read a 178K mailbox
> mounted over a fast NFS (using fiber) seems _very_ slow
> to me. If I create a new file (so it can't be cached on
> my machine) on our mailhost with the same size and copy
> it over to my machine
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:00:41PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The reason for the speed decrease you are observing is
> that earlier mutt versions' fcntl locking didn't really
> work. Working fcntl locking, however, will invalidate the
> NFS client's cache, which in turn reduces performance t
On 2000-07-11 10:32:37 +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
>> Note that this cache invalidation is _not_ an error.
>> In fact, some Linux versions incorrectly used cached
>> data, which reportedly lead to mail loss in several
>> cases.
> Isn't better to test for host enviroment and make
> decision
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:32:37 +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
> Isn't better to test for host enviroment and make decision on result ?
> For example use cache if host system is solaris or another unix with good
> caching.
I used to use dotlocking only under Solaris+NFS, and I *never* had
any
Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On 2000-07-10 17:59:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
>
> > We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I
> > would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower
> > than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling
> > with --disable-fcntl hel
On 2000-07-10 17:59:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
> We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I
> would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower
> than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling
> with --disable-fcntl helps, but that doesn't seem to be
> recommended according t
We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I would like to
upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower than 1.0 when reading my
mailbox over NFS. Compiling with --disable-fcntl helps, but that
doesn't seem to be recommended according to the FAQ on www.mutt.org.
The same FAQ also claims that th
