On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:23:31PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > and so i get:
> > To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
> >
> > i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when on
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:10:13PM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > > alright, i saw the unhook, let me
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
> > >
> >
> > cann&#x
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
>
cann't unhook from within a hook :
folder-hook . "unhook *"
this has no effect, or not the effect i want it to have:
unhook *
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:16:50AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
> >
>
> cann't unhook from within a hook :
> folder-hook . "unhook
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:37:49PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> > > and this to hooks:
> > > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > >
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:37:49PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> > and this to hooks:
> > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > set autoedit=yes
> > my_hdr To:'
> > folder-hook to:mutt-user
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 05:45:54PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
> > > ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> > > >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > >'To:' he
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:46]:
> > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is th
is that swapped or what?
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
> >header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> >i don't think a folder-ho
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:46]:
> > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is th
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:01:41PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:54]:
> >
> > starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
> > works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you
> > need
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:53:57PM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> Untested, but I presume "unset record" will work.
nice, thanks.
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:45:51PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:41]:
> > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:09]:
> > > > right now i have:
> > > > set record
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:44:58PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> How are you trying to "reply to list"? Are you using the "L" key as
> described in the fine manual?
yes. i'm not talking about _reply_, i'm talking about starting a thread.
starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you need
to skip the 'To:'
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > i don't think a folder-ho
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:27:34PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:09]:
> > right now i have:
> > set record = /dev/null
> >
> > but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any
> > suggestions?
>
> use
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > i don't think a folder-ho
right now i have:
set record = /dev/null
but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any
suggestions?
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if i'm wrong
please). so perhaps a macro?
22 matches
Mail list logo
