ould be written for IMAP to
> fill this hole. It shouldn't be added to the MUAs.
And it's being done, though it's still in the design stages.
See, for example, http://www.imc.org/draft-showalter-sieve-main
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's edit
in the ppp-up script but that's beyond the capabilities of
the new user to set up correctly, so ssmtp works (especially when
dealing with users that are insistent that they have to be online to
write mail).
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor.
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | If He used Emacs, He'd still be waiting
Usenet Vandal | for it to load on the seventh day.
Netscum, Bane of Elves.
t down
> more). Sure its not as powerfull as procmail can get, but its certainly
> better for simple filtering wich is what most people need to do anyways.
More successful would be a gui-frontend to procmail, along the lines
of the dotfile generator.
--
Brian Moore
some nice files in the "contrib" directory,
> but I don't know how to put them together to make it work.
Most likely in /usr/lib/gnupg, or perhaps /usr/local/lib/gnupg.
To ~/.gnupg/options, add:
load-extension rsaref
load-extension idea
(or just plain rsa if that's legal whe
not self-signed, since PGP2 allowed creation
of such, but then such keys are not secure anyway, and people shouldn't
trust them.)
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor.
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | If He used Emacs, He'd still be waiting
Usenet Vandal | for it to load on the seventh day.
Netscum, Bane of Elves.
ral good practice when
> reporting a problem,
Actually, as I recall, it was a bit trickier... it's an -old- version of
ncurses being found. I had to hunt and destroy all the 1.9's hiding on my
system in various guises to make it behave.
In this case, an ldd from those with problem
\
n/-e/x:''/ \
n@-b@'`cat $HOME/.mail_aliases | awk '"'"'{print $2 }'"'"\`@ \
n@-c@'`cat $HOME/.mail_aliases | awk '"'"'{print $2 }'"'"\
me working around the problem.
But there -is- an option.
I read old 'clearsigned' stuff all the time from within mutt, and I can
sign or encrypt a document from within vi before passing it back to
mutt.
Should mutt add support for attaching files with uuencode so
ike some of us could just barely handle MIME a few years ago), you may
have to be nice and not do it as PGP-MIME, but just as you would have
encouraged people that only had uudecode for binaries to upgrade their
software, you should encourage those stuck without PGP-MIME to upgrade
to some
the pgp code yet from mutt yet, but suppose it could be a
> quick hack if this is the case. Alternately, maybe someone has specific muttrc
> settings for getting gpg to play with mutt?
My only weird stuff is:
set pgp_sign_micalg="pgp-sha1"
But that may be unneccesary.
--
Brian Moore
info-based)
> distribution, which resulted in the same results. I made sure
> it was using 4.2 via 'mutt -v'.
No, that tells you what Mutt was compiled to link to. Use ldd to
determine what it is really linking to.
--
Brian Moore | "The
ed the aforementioned problem using the following
> software:
>
> CRT
> SecureCRT
> Windows Telnet
> FreeBSD console
> Linux console
> Sun console
It doesn't do it with a plain old 'xterm' and ncurses 4.2. No idea wha
ges or to tell PGP to shut up?
Edit the PGP5 source. You can make the "/dev/null" message go away if
you use a language file for PGP (see the Mutt docs). The other string,
though, is handled somewhat differently and you'll actually have to
patch it out of the code (look for &
enticating (as "pgpv filename"
would).
It's just the nature of PGP5 to behave that way.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal |
ines if there is more than
one recipient in order to protect privacy.)
There are hacks to sendmail to add an X-Envelope-To header, though.
See <754uqb$4ve$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for an example that works pretty well.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer re
s, it needs some work.
> is it stable?
As stable as mutt.
> where do I find more info on it?
http://www.gnupg.org/
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vand
message id in the header (which is very logic as this message-id in the
> header gets added later by Sendmail). The number looks encrypted as
> well, as there are no @'s or domainname in it.
That's normal, too.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a sp
ou actually use the 'web of trust' stuff
for validity. Many if not most PGP users don't actually use it and just
trust that 0xDEADBEEF is their pal.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, excep
mail.
(This is, of course, assuming that your copy of Mutt supports gpg.)
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolution
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 12:56:09AM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 03:24:29PM -0800, brian moore wrote:
> >
> > The most obvious of which is the 'UIDVALIDITY' values: each item in your
> > mailbox is assigned a specific Unique Identifier
increasing. This is crucial for stateless uses such as
web based email. Do you really want to blindly delete the 7th item in
your box, or would you rather delete an item with a unique ID?
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl
better.) I'm just too lazy to type it as needed.
> Of course, Mutt has no ability to create multipart/alternative messages,
> as far as I can tell.
Probably due to the lack of 'need', since there's not a good way to
create the content. :/
(Wondering if he should hack a text
of the PGP5 stuff.)
Mutt then tacks on the 'v' (to verify), 's' (to sign), etc.
> Andy...
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
>
> > Salvo --
> >
> > Did you go through and make sure you get all of your commands change
23 matches
Mail list logo
