On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 02:49:49PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 02:38:23PM -0400, Hardy Merrill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Another newbie question - I've setup my .mailcap file to include
> >
> > text/html; lynx %s
> >
> [snip--sees source not html formatted]
> > I'm expec
the tagged messages to the appropriate folder. I have one macro
for each folder.
This gives me a sort of semi-automatic filter (I guess I can't be
trusted with a full-auto filter).
Now I'm going to go bug those guys about procmail...I've use that
elsewhere and it's great for filtering.
- Tom Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Gero Treuner on Thu,
Apr 13, 2000 at 04:22:21PM +0200
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 04:22:21PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 08:36:05PM -0600, Tom Hall wrote:
> > When I go to reply to a mes
When I go to reply to a message that was sent in HTML format,
mutt doesn't quote the original message. The reply body just
has the $attribution string.
Is there a way to get mutt to pipe the message through lynx
and include it in the body of the reply ? (with the $indent_str ?)
- Tom
and I always got these
annoying error messages and had to hit enter twice when starting.
Now, my .muttrc just sources ~/.muttrc-$HOST, and they both start up
just fine.
Thanks Erik !
- Tom Hall
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Mark Bainter wrote:
>
> Why in the world would it be beneficial to have pre-compiled DOS and/or W32
> binaries available? This smells more like digging for trouble to me.
Lynx does it.
If I want to do some quick web browsing, and I'm stuck running W95
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 02:05:29PM -0700, rex wrote:
> ...
> Yarn users would be good candidates to use Mutt if DOS/W32 binaries
> were available.
Actually, the reason I've only been a little obnoxious about asking for
these is that I found a copy of ElmPC out on simtel which, thanks to
Pete's f
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 10:46:09AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net
> > evolves. See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html.
>
> I think we're not giving people enough credit. Just because they
> use some other mailer w
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 04:56:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
> Just curious.
So we can win 'mindshare', and mutt will continue to work as the 'net evolves.
See http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html.
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 03:02:54PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Holger Eitzenberger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...So if it's just inertia
> (and we care), then maybe some advocacy needs to be done.
If it's advocacy you want, release pre-compiled binaries for W32 and/or
DOS. PC hackers will
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 03:29:23PM -0700, wrote:
> Re hello
>
> and thanks to those who answered but...
>
> maybe I didn't explain clearly...
>
> I know how to pipe to sendmail or other, but I don't know how to have mutt write
>the message to a file (or to the standard output)
>
> is t
11 matches
Mail list logo
