iain truskett wrote:
[snip]
> So, a quick analysis of the stats produces:
>
> 12182Mutt
> 21756Microsoft Outlook Express
> 31396Mozilla
> 41336eGroups
> 51123Internet Mail Service
> 6948 Micro
Mutt's current behavior is consistent with elm and other mailers.
This is traditional mbox behavior. I happen to like it.
> Great! Developers, will you change it then? :-)
I hope not. There is no need to have the mtime to be updated
every time the ctime is updated. (Or, if there is such a ne
At 04:49 PM 9/11/00 -0500, David McNett wrote:
>
>-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1047184 Sep 11 11:31 /usr/local/bin/lynx
>-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 321608 Jun 4 19:06 /usr/local/bin/links
>-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 261132 May 22 08:10 /usr/local/bin/w3m
>
>This is reason enough for me to prefer
Peter Palfrader wrote:
...
> but this should work for all editors (that support +):
>
> set editor="vim +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\` %s"
>
> It is stolen from Roland Rosenfeld's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> great
> muttrcs.
Or even better, use the builtin awk variable NR:
set edito
At 05:26 AM 7/26/00 +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
...
>hmmm... do you really want to solve this with mutt? I suppose you're using
>procmail for delivering your mail into different mailboxes, aren't you?
>remember procmail can expand Shell expressions when interpreting its config.
>so why don't us
At 11:11 AM 7/25/00 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>Russell Hoover proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
>> ignore * # This means "ignore all header lines by default."
>> unignore From: Date Subject To Cc Organization Organisation User-Agent \
>> X-Mailer X-
>> ignore X-Priority X-MSMail-Pri
At 11:55 PM 6/29/00 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[...]
>I'm also not aware of whether there is any specified way to have
>Reply-To set to more than one address. You can either have multiple
>Reply-To headers, one address per header, or you can have multiple
>addresses in one header. I think that
At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
>> Daniel --
>>
>> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
>
>I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
>for the 'alias' setting?
At 09:09 PM 1/5/00 -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
>Can anyone tell me how to handle a MIME attachment that was encoded
>using BinHex 4.0? I received an e-mail containing several JPEG photos
>that were attached as follows:
[snip]
>Content-Type: application/mac-binhex40; name="putin4.jpg"
>Conten
At 05:21 PM 12/11/99 +1100, Craig McVean wrote:
>Hi to all muttets?
>I have mutt working quit well Except my .procmailrc is not placing all my
>mailing lists into theire own mailboxes mutt-users is working nicely.
[snip]
>I'm using Maildir should i be using mbox as my mailbox type? My machine is
At 03:07 PM 8/20/99 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:40 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[snip]
>> Maybe a quick hack would be best here, like writing a script that
>> would first remove the Delivered-To header and then remail it
>> manually (eg. "grep -v ^Delivered-To:" pi
At 10:50 PM 7/2/99 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
>Barbara --
>
>...and then Barbara K Jensen said...
>% Excerpts from mail: 30-Jun-99 Re: installation errors for.. by David
>% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>% > > 1. When Mutt is started or ended, it insists on doing a message count
>% >
>% > When
At 11:39 PM 7/2/99 -0600, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
[snip]
>I have a patch that I absolutely could not do without that may be of
>interest to you.
>
>Originally by Sean Ahern, I refer to it as the "flag_text" patch. It
>allows *you* to add an arbitrary string to any message, which gets
>stored in an X-
At 10:47 AM 6/13/99 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>On 06/13/1999 (13:27:37), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> At 11:14 AM 6/7/99 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> >Having to
>> >go through and manually remove all these spaces, even in vi, is
>> >a tedious process and should not have to be do
At 11:14 AM 6/7/99 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Having to
> go through and manually remove all these spaces, even in vi, is
> a tedious process and should not have to be done at all.
I won't address mutt/slang here, but removing all trailing blanks
in vi is hardly tedious:
Brian D: Winters wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
> > Althought most messages to the list have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To
> > header, there are a number that don't. These messages appear to have
> > nothing in any header to identify that they belong to this l
At 10:50 PM 5/2/99 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>paul dixit:
>~> 2. After reading the FAQ, I went searching for my .muttrc file in my
>~> home directory, but was unable to locate it, yes I did a ls -a,
>~> shouldn't there be a default .muttrc that I can modify to my needs?
>
>There should be on
Sorry for a bit of metadiscussion, but has anyone else noticed that
sometimes we get a few of the list headers moved inside the message?
For example:
> How do I include "" (literal quotes) in a string in muttrc which has
> to be delimited with "" ?
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: bulk
At 05:40 AM 2/6/99 -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
>> Given that there is no current reason to have mutt-* closed,
>
>Sure there is. I'm on 3 open lists (to my regret), and I get no less than
>12 pieces of spam per day from each of them. On most of them (like gnuplot),
>the content to spam ratio is pret
Jim Graham wrote:
> And in some cases, it doesn't. At home, every e-mail that comes in
> >from outside addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i.e., it doesn't
> matter whether it's addressed to me, root, etc.) starts with
>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>
> Mail delivery to my machine (except fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
