I'm attempting to do the following:
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr cc'
send-hook user@kcls\\.org'my_hdr cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The problem is, the header change always takes affect for the following
message instead of the current one. What am I doing wrong?
-- Scott McDer
Russell Van Tassell on Mon 22/03 12:52 -0800:
> I would appear as if Mutt 0.95.4i will "run away" on a Solaris 2.5.1
> machine if the terminal disappears from it (like a couple of other
> well-known Solaris tools).
Unrelated problem (the subject made me think of it):
If the directory mutt was st
Ayman Haidar on Thu 18/03 22:46 -0500:
> I was wondering if it's possible to color the title of an email
> message like:
>
>1 b Mar 18 To LUG ( 13) [WLUG] nslookup
> ^^^
> |
>
David Ellement on Sun 7/03 10:21 -0800:
> > --- configure.inThu Mar 4 18:21:48 1999
> > +++ configure.in.newFri Mar 5 06:38:19 1999
> > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> > ;;
> > esac
> >
> > -AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib)
> > +ac_aux_path_sendmail=":/usr/s
Stewart Wright on Mon 8/03 15:05 +0918:
> You can use the %-sequences from the index-format command in the
> foldernames in fcc, save, and fcc-save hooks.
>
> By using a '%u' the save-to name will be that of the author. This is
> fine when saving doing a save, but falls over when doing a fcc.
Why is it lower case? So one can distinguish, "this is a thread?"
Or does it mean that all messages in the collapsed thread are new?
--
Scott
Lars Hecking on Fri 5/03 12:35 +:
> > The fix would involve making `:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib' from line 1159
> > above to be the value of a variable, defined before this line, and
> > expanded in the line instead of that string itself. While I am not
> > familiar with autoconf or m4, the attached
Thomas Roessler on Wed 3/03 21:35 +0100:
> Mutt 0.95.4 is out. This version should be considered BETA.
There is a bug in the `configure' script that comes with this
distribution.
1158 IFS="${IFS= . }"; ac_save_ifs="$IFS"; IFS="${IFS}:"
1159 for ac_dir in $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib$ac_du
Liviu Daia on Tue 16/02 01:02 +0200:
> [sound logical reasons why this is not so]
>
> The fact it's not automatically sourced is just a minor annoyance; if
> you don't want to miss a change when you update your .muttrc, all you
> have to do is put the two commands next to each other (which, BTW, y
It would seem that certain conversions in $index_format overwrite each
other, so one cannot tell what flags are involved decisively. Eg, a
tagged message doesn't show the to_char, and nor does an
important-flagged message. All three of these compete for one character
space (the tag wins every ti
Since I would imagine everyone does source one that defines this
variable. Would only make sense to source it automatically...then one
would not have to remember to change two strings if alias file name
changes...just one.
--
Scott
David DeSimone on Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 01:25:31PM -0600:
> > I don't understand what %d is for then. It's specified as being the
> > date and time, as specified by $date_format, itself a string parsed
> > by strftime(). It this can be accomplished as easily using the
> > bracketized methods, the
David DeSimone on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 10:10:36PM -0600:
> > What relevance does the message date have to the filename of the
> > message folder? The default $index_format is:
> >
> > %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s
> >
> > And I'm trying to understand why `%b' is between those braces
Vikas Agnihotri on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 07:04:37PM -0500:
> Personally, I think it would make the index too "technicolor" for
> comfort. Psychedelic, distracting... Heck, I coded the color index
> feature, but I dont use it myself, because of this very same reason. I
> start to get a headache from
What possible use is "filename of the original message folder" between
`%{}'? IOW, what relevance does the message date have to the filename of
the message folder? The default $index_format is:
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s
And I'm trying to understand why `%b' is between those brace
Mika Fischer on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 10:17:29PM +0100:
> > > Is there a way to do so?
> >
> > How do you mean? Did you read about 'color index ...' in the manual?
> > You can specify colors for different messages in the index using
> > Mutt's pattern-matching language.
> >
> > Is this what you m
Is there a way to do so?
--
Scott
Peter van Dijk on Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:07:01PM +0100:
> > Sorry if this is a FAQ - just joined the world of mutt, and the
> > archive's web site seems a bit cranky at the moment.
> >
> > Is there a command I can put in a mailbox hook to change my from and
> > reply-to address on a mailbox by m
synthpunk on Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 01:11:07PM -0500:
> I use mutt to change my From: header to appear to be from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I am sending mail from my main machine.
> I subscribed to a mailing list @ eGroups.com, and it takes the From
> line rather than the From: line as which address
Thomas Roessler on Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:46:28AM +0100:
> > Haven't seen Michael Elkins in this list in some time, is he still
> > doing mutt, or has he moved on?
>
> I think the last surfacing of Michael I observed was on the
> ietf-open-pgp mailing list. Apparently, he's quite busy with his
Have mutt return a success message if ispell returns a 0. Or something
like that. Currently if ispell runs over a message and finds no errors,
there is no way of knowing that ispell ran at all.
--
Scott
Adam M. Costello on Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 03:45:58AM +:
> In the pager, next-line and previous-line appear to repaint the entire
> screen instead of scrolling it. Scrolling it would be a lot faster.
> The same might be true for the index.
This may be dependent on your curses implementation (
22 matches
Mail list logo
