On 2014/12/15 1:24 PM, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
>> ~f does work on my machine (Tested with ~f t...@example.org /and/
>> with 'score').
>> The "From" header (yahoo group) looks similar to yours:
>
> It's not similar enough:
>
>>
On 2014/12/15 1:24 PM, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
>> ~f does work on my machine (Tested with ~f t...@example.org /and/
>> with 'score').
>> The "From" header (yahoo group) looks similar to yours:
>
> It's not similar enough:
>
>>
On 2014/12/15 1:24 PM, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
>> ~f does work on my machine (Tested with ~f t...@example.org /and/
>> with 'score').
>> The "From" header (yahoo group) looks similar to yours:
>
> It's not similar enough:
>
>>
On 2014/12/15 1:24 PM, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
>> ~f does work on my machine (Tested with ~f t...@example.org /and/
>> with 'score').
>> The "From" header (yahoo group) looks similar to yours:
>
> It's not similar enough:
>
>>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
>> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having
>> tens of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
-snip off responses-
Thank you for your informative responses.
On 2014/9/18 4:27 PM, David Champion wrote:
> * On 18 Sep 2014, Mark Filipak wrote:
>> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
>> of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
>>
>> Thank You.
>
> [473/130]$ du -sh /var
How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
Thank You.
On 2014/9/17 3:40 PM, Derek Martin wrote:
-a lot of very sensible stuff, which I've snipped off-
Dear Derek,
I'd like to briefly correspond with you. I believe my address is part of
this message's message headers. If it strikes your fancy, would you
kindly drop me a line?
Ciao - Mark Filipak.
=== Lurk-Mode OFF ===
Duck and cover!
=== Lurk-Mode ON ===
On 2014/9/15 10:09 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 14.09.14 16:29, Will Yardley wrote:
>> The problem, though, is that doing so in a tool like mutt where the
>> editor is (by design) completely divorced from the MUA does make it a
>> l
message line that begins "From ". You can't create such a
line without the sending application adding ">" in front of the word
"From". That's just plain dumb.
=== Lurk-Mode ON ===
On 2014/9/14 7:29 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 0
=== Lurk-Mode OFF ===
I created a minor civil war on the Mozilla list when I proposed that
text NOT be flowed at all; that it's the responsibility of the viewing
application to format messages to the user's specification; that
formatting should NOT be coded within messages. Flowing and rewrapping
On 2014/5/12 7:58 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:48:48PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:12:54AM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
>>> On 2014/5/11 11:08 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>>> -snip-
>>>> More worrying ar
On Sat,May 10 06:49:PM, Derek Martin wrote:
> Mostly I reply here due to a curiosity: Why is "'messed'" in single
> quotes here? I see people do this increasingly often, and I don't get
> why.
Are you a coder, Derek? I use single-quotes when I'm coding because it's
faster; I don't have to hit t
On 2014/5/11 11:08 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
-snip-
> More worrying are the strange ammendments that American English is
> imposing (or has imposed) on us people who speak the proper English!
I'm sorry, but as an American I have to come out of lurk mode for this...
What you tried to write, Chris
On 2014/4/9 2:39 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Mark Filipak [04-09-14 14:35]:
>> On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> -snip-
>>> I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
>>> the recipients could be many.
>>
>>
On 2014/4/7 4:15 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
-snip-
> I can imagine that the problem is: a sender is always one person, while
> the recipients could be many.
Actually, a sender is not always one person. If you have multiple Google
accounts, for example, which you configure as SMTP & POP (or IMAP)
se
On 2014/4/9 11:55 AM, Derek Martin wrote:
-snip-
> I've said it many times, but I think that's perfectly reasonable,
> especially with something that has such a steep learning curve, as
> Mutt does. Asking a question about your specific problem is by far
> the fastest way to get the answer, if
On 2014/2/28 2:11 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:39:19AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
>> On 2014-02-28, YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List wrote:
>
>>> On Mutt 1.5.21, my editor is Vim 7.3.
>>> I don't like when it breaks automatically my lines when I am
>>> writing an e-mail.
>>>
>>> Is t
Hi, Michael, thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate it, a lot.
On 2013/11/21 3:23 PM, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 21 Nov 2013 19:46:41 Mark Filipak wrote:
Nope, dovecot handles the maildir part, and deliveres finest IMAP, which
many Windows MUAs understand.
But I am not going to be running an
Hi, Andre,
On 2013/11/21 1:47 PM, Andre Klärner wrote:
On Thu 21.11.2013 00:29:52, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 2013/11/20 6:12 PM, Mick wrote:
with a virtual LAN adapter in the Host, a virtual LAN adapter in the
Guest, and a virtual Bridge in the Guest that's bound to the Host's
rea
pment for a long
time, that Mozilla has pulled everyone away to work on Firefox OS, that only
one person is assigned to TBird and they're doing maintenance only. Meaning:
TBird maildir is full of fatal bugs and will remain that way for the indefinite
future.
-snip-
On Wednesday 20 Nov 20
Thanks for your reply, Mick...
On 2013/11/20 2:59 PM, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 20 Nov 2013 07:42:34 you wrote:
On 2013/11/19 1:51 AM, Mick wrote:
I don't know what permissions problems you are talking about...
Windows kept saying "Hey! That came from an alien system. I'm not going to
let y
On 2013/11/19 1:51 AM, Mick wrote:
On Monday 18 Nov 2013 05:29:04 Mark Filipak wrote:
My setup is a virtual machine environment.
Host OS: Windows-7, 64bit, without an Internet connection.
Guest OS: Linux Mint 14, with an Internet connection.
Shared folder #1: The download directory (Net
On 2013/11/19 3:02 AM, Edward Toroshchin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:51:15PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
Thank you, Edward, but I want to be able to read email in the Windows Host
which has no Internet access. I don't see how IMAP would help?
I meant setting it up on your virtual
On 2013/11/18 3:19 AM, Edward Toroshchin wrote:
Have you considered setting up an IMAP server? This should solve all
your problems.
Thank you, Edward, but I want to be able to read email in the Windows Host
which has no Internet access. I don't see how IMAP would help?
Also, I think Samba w
Hello, mutt-heads,
I've been lurking here for a couple of months. I'm considering mutt because I
want 1 file per message and maildir has that and mutt supports maildir.
I assume that you all think that mutt is the most dependable, maildir
compatible MUA.
My setup is a virtual machine enviro
On 2013/6/25 11:47 PM, John Niendorf wrote:
I've been watching this thread for a while and thinking "Good grief, give me a
break".
This is only my point of view.
1. RTFM is rude. It is usually written by people who seem to feel the need to
show that they know more than someone else.
2. Having t
27 matches
Mail list logo
