On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:35:46AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy.
> % Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply.
> %
> % What is the wrong here?
>
> mutt has to know who you are before it can
Hi,
I have set the following:
# don't reply to myself
set metoo=no
but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy.
Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply.
What is the wrong here?
Thanks.
Jun
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:25:05AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 00:26]:
> > > % folder-hook . set record=""
> > > % folder-hook =local set record="=local"
> > > % folder-hook =haviworks set record="=haviworks"
> > > % folder-hook =ebase set record="
02:57:44PM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Jun Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 14:55]:
> > I have multiple mailbox folders. I want to save a copy of outgoing
> > message in the current mbox folder. Pretty reasonable enough.
> >
> > The following solution s
I have multiple mailbox folders. I want to save a copy of outgoing
message in the current mbox folder. Pretty reasonable enough.
The following solution seems to work:
folder-hook . set record=""
folder-hook =local set record="=local"
folder-hook =haviworks set record="=haviworks"
folder-hook
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:28PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> Jun Sun wrote:
> >
> > Often times when I hit "g" for a group reply, I have myself included
> > in the CC address. Since I have already set up mutt such that I will
> > get BCC'ed for my
Often times when I hit "g" for a group reply, I have myself included in
the CC address. Since I have already set up mutt such that I will
get BCC'ed for my replies, I will then two copies of my own reply.
Is there a way to *not* include myself when I hit "g" group reply?
Thanks.
Jun
