Re: Caching body of IMAP messages

2012-06-13 Thread John J. Foster
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:04:46PM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: > On Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:47PM, Morris, Patrick wrote: > > > I have entries in my .muttrc for caching both headers and message > > > bodies. > > > > > > set header_cache="~/.mutt/headers" > > > set message_cachedir ="~/.mutt/bodies" > >

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-05 Thread John J. Foster
Forgot to mention - this is strictly an IMAP connection - no local mailboxes On Thu, 05 May 2011 11:12 -0400, "Tim Gray" wrote: > On May 05, 2011 at 08:52 AM -0600, John J. Foster wrote: > >My header cache (tokyo cabinet) seems to get slow on certain mailboxes > >eve

Re: offlineimap much slower than gmail-imap

2011-05-05 Thread John J. Foster
My header cache (tokyo cabinet) seems to get slow on certain mailboxes every few weeks. I just blow away that mailboxes cache and let it rebuild and all is well again. I ALWAYS blow away the entire cache whenever I pull a new version of mutt from mercurial and whenever tokyo cabinet gets updated (M

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

2010-09-18 Thread John J. Foster
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote: > > On 18 Sep 2010, at 22:16, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > > Does your /var/log/mail gives any more clues? > > On the client machine? Apparently I don't have one (this is a vanilla mutt > build +tokyocabinet running on OS X. it's /p

Re: return reciepts

2010-07-01 Thread John J. Foster
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:08:43PM +0200, lee wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:21:31PM +0200, lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > how do you handle return reciepts with mutt? I know I can add header > > lines to request a reciept (with my_hdr), but how do I make it so that > > reciepts are requested bas

Re: Purge single deleted email

2009-11-17 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:46 -0800, "Brendan Cully" wrote: > On Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 11:31, Kevin Kobb wrote: > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > >On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Kevin Kobb wrote: > > >>Hello, > > >> > > >>I am using mutt to connect to a Cyrus IMAP server. It is working > >

Re: Anyone else having trouble with function keys and the latest tip

2009-07-08 Thread John J. Foster
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:14 -0500, "Kyle Wheeler" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Tuesday, July 7 at 07:03 PM, quoth John J. Foster: > > This was pretty much self-inflicted. I've been having command line > > display

Re: Anyone else having trouble with function keys and the latest tip

2009-07-07 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * John J. Foster wrote: > > > All of my function keys stopped working with the latest tip. > > Not here. Any bindings, any example? With command+F1 I get the manual as > expected. > This was pr

Anyone else having trouble with function keys and the latest tip

2009-07-06 Thread John J. Foster
fes...@magpie ~/src/mutt $ hg tip changeset: 5974:ccab6c56b557 branch: HEAD tag: tip user:Rocco Rutte date:Mon Jul 06 15:28:04 2009 +0200 summary: Manual: Add a note about when/why to use utf-8 All of my function keys stopped working with the latest tip. Te

Re: How to let mutt always mark mbox as new if it contains new

2009-05-08 Thread John J. Foster
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:17:37PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote: > No, just new emails remain the new mark, but the mbox that contains them not. > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: I could be totally off the mark here, but I believe the problem is mutt's interpretation of n

Re: what is the benefit of imap?

2009-03-18 Thread John J. Foster
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:13:19PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > and IMAP makes it possible for me to sue my own client when I can. I'm so glad you're not my lawyer. festus -- I just want to break even. pgpVsQJIFrmZI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

2009-03-08 Thread John J. Foster
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:44:45PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > (e.g. I don't believe gnome-terminal does, and I *know* Apple Terminal > doesn't either). Chances are you want to add some logic to your > ~/.bashrc (or equivalent for your shell) to set the LANG environment > variable correctly fo

Re: Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix

2009-02-13 Thread John J. Foster
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:20 +0100, "Jan-Herbert Damm" wrote: > Kyle Wheeler: > >... However, because I use > > , when there aren't any tagged messages (i.e. the > > pattern "~r >3m" didn't match anything), mutt will stop processing > > that hook and none of the rest of it will happen. > > > >

Re: Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix

2009-02-12 Thread John J. Foster
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:29:01PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, February 12 at 08:15 PM, quoth John J. Foster: > >Am I nuts, or are these functionally equivalent? > > You're nuts. :) > > But they *are* very similar. Tag-prefix, of course, means that the &g

Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix

2009-02-12 Thread John J. Foster
Am I nuts, or are these functionally equivalent? Thanks, festus -- I just want to break even. Richard Manuel pgpvpN1XDkAnL.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Archiving

2009-02-12 Thread John J. Foster
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:00:12PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > folder-hook =Sent 'push "~r > >3m=Archive.Sent~A"' > Most excellent - thanks Kyle! festus -- I just want to break even. Richard Manuel pgpSTJaRMYI2Z.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-08 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:32 -0800, "Brendan Cully" wrote: > On Tuesday, 06 January 2009 at 20:25, John J. Foster wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:18:35PM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > > > $ ./prepare -prefix=/opt/local/ --with-ssl --enable-hcache --enable-imap &g

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-08 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:57 -0800, "Brendan Cully" wrote: > > that's all indicative of an old version. But note that: > > ~/src/mutt $ mutt -v > > is NOT the same as > > ~/src/mutt $ ./mutt -v > > (. is not normally in your path). So if you pulled, forgot to up -C > HEAD, and make installed yo

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:59:02PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Tuesday, 06 January 2009 at 20:54, John J. Foster wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:32:34PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > Looks like you need to hg up -C HEAD > > I'd already done that as w

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:32:34PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > Looks like you need to hg up -C HEAD I'd already done that as was listed in my previous post, but did it again. fes...@magpie ~/src/mutt $ hg up -C HEAD 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved > Compare

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:18:35PM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > $ ./prepare -prefix=/opt/local/ --with-ssl --enable-hcache --enable-imap > --disable-fcntl --enable-flock --with-regex > > This bombed out with > ... > ... > checking for gdbm_open... no > checking fo

Re: Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing

2009-01-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:47:24PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: >> I got a MBP for Christmas (yippie) and am looking for a good howto on >> compiling Mutt on it. I have been running 1.5.18 from HEAD, and would >> like to continue. I don't want, at least initially, to install either >> MacPorts or

Compiling Mutt on a Macbook Pro and recommendation for mailing list

2009-01-05 Thread John J. Foster
I got a MBP for Christmas (yippie) and am looking for a good howto on compiling Mutt on it. I have been running 1.5.18 from HEAD, and would like to continue. I don't want, at least initially, to install either MacPorts or Fink. I'm also looking for a good Mac mailing list that leans toward the admi

Re: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-12-10) and folder_format

2008-12-14 Thread John J. Foster
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 07:35:51AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Dave Wood [12-13-08 23:23]: > > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes > > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes? > > No, I'm still on 1.5.13 and KBytes are shown, but it is %c, not %s. > %

Re: 1.5.18 (from HEAD) and threading

2008-12-10 Thread John J. Foster
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 02:32:10PM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > I've noticed that when running 1.5.18 (from HEAD), that when new mail > arrives in the current mailbox, it get put at the end of the index > instead of in the thread it belongs. When did this change take place? I &g

Re: 1.5.18 (from HEAD) and threading

2008-12-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 02:32:10PM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > I've noticed that when running 1.5.18 (from HEAD), that when new mail > arrives in the current mailbox, it get put at the end of the index > instead of in the thread it belongs. When did this change take place? I &g

1.5.18 (from HEAD) and threading

2008-12-06 Thread John J. Foster
I've noticed that when running 1.5.18 (from HEAD), that when new mail arrives in the current mailbox, it get put at the end of the index instead of in the thread it belongs. When did this change take place? I was previously running 1.5.16. Thanks, festus -- I just want to break even. pgpOfvTVu

Re: [semi OT] - Setup for LDAP access to fastmail.fm

2008-12-05 Thread John J. Foster
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:13:43PM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:58:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:48:20AM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > > > authentication required at /home/festus/mutt-ldap.pl line 46, > >

Re: [semi OT] - Setup for LDAP access to fastmail.fm

2008-12-05 Thread John J. Foster
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:58:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:48:20AM -0700, John J. Foster wrote: > > authentication required at /home/festus/mutt-ldap.pl line 46, > > line 466. > > Ok, what _is_ line 46? Hmm, and line 466? > I have

Re: query_format current entry number starts at zero with 1.5.18

2008-11-30 Thread John J. Foster
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 08:45:39PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * John J. Foster wrote: >> I've just recently switched to 1.5.18 (mainly because of increased >> hcache performance) and have noticed that the results shown from a >> query_command start at 0 as

query_format current entry number starts at zero with 1.5.18

2008-11-30 Thread John J. Foster
I've just recently switched to 1.5.18 (mainly because of increased hcache performance) and have noticed that the results shown from a query_command start at 0 as opposed to 1. This makes it impossible to change to an entry by its number. My query command is: set query_command="/home/festus/bin/mut

Re: [semi OT] - Setup for LDAP access to fastmail.fm

2008-11-30 Thread John J. Foster
Sorry for the noise - it was a firewall issue. festus -- I just want to break even.

[semi OT] - Setup for LDAP access to fastmail.fm

2008-11-28 Thread John J. Foster
Hi all, I'm using a script (http://www.bsdconsulting.no/tools/mutt-ldap.pl) to try to access my address book on fastmail.fm. I've changed the following: # --- configuration --- $ldapserver = "ldap.messagingengine.com"; $domain = "fastmail.fm"; $username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED],ou=Users'; $password =

Re: On "RTFM"

2008-09-23 Thread John J. Foster
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:43:25AM -0500, David Champion wrote: > > What's the trouble? Let people ask questions honestly and politely, > but if all you have to give is "rtfm", with no reference or citation or > vague hint at a substantive answer, then don't bother replying -- or at > least keep

Re: OT: offending sig + headers

2007-05-18 Thread John J. Foster
Come on folks. It's a public mailing list we're talking about here. You ask a question in public. You get an answer in public. I've seen Derek's sig line here for years, but be insulted by it??? You got to be kidding. It's an effing ".signature"! festus -- It is not unusual for those at the wron