* On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Brian Bray wrote:
> I've been looking around for a painless way to modify the From header based on
> which account I am using.
Maybe you just need to set $alternates and $reverse_name.
--
John
* On Tue, 08 Oct 2002, Ken Irving wrote:
> Apologies for subscribing just to ask a question, and maybe for the
> unclear subject. Too often I accidentally hit 'q' after editing a
> message, and am presented with the choice to discard the message or not.
> Usually I want to select a third option
* On Sat, 05 Oct 2002, James Marsh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:44:58PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
>
> >>I am however having a problem with sending attached images with the
> >>correct mime types --- they're appearing as application/octet-stream
> >>
* On Sat, 05 Oct 2002, James Marsh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using mutt for the last week and am very impressed so far,
> especially with the amount of helpful information and scripts
> etc that are generally available.
>
> I am however having a problem with sending attached images with t
* On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Jack Bates wrote:
> Does mutt include a command to move a message from one folder to
> another? Thanks,
The save command ('s' by default) is for that. To copy, use 'C'
(by default).
--
John
* On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, PeterKorman wrote:
> It'z back.
Not for me. Things seem fine.
* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
> A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> email. I'm currently using:
>
> :0 :
> * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-users
>
> :0 :
> * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> mutt-user
* On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're
> in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some
> mailbox and press enter?
This happens when you get new mail in the last mailbox you
visited after going to the browser. M
* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]
>
> so - 69 messages since 26th September...
I only see about 9 messages *after* Sep 26 and they're all
addressed to gbnet. Do the online archives look okay to you?
I got the mes
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages
that says:
Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64
MB by 0.0 MB. If you don't remove messages, old
* On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:34:58PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
> > * On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> >
> > > I want to color my headers, but something goes wrong here. For
> > > example: I have the s
* On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> I've searched the archives but didn't find a proper solution.
See the "Header color" thread from July 25, 2002, for one
discussion of this.
--
John
* On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> I want to color my headers, but something goes wrong here. For
> example: I have the subject colored white, with a blue
> background, but the rest of the line stays black... I've
> searched the archives but didn't find a proper solution.
>
> I'm us
* On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm a little unsure of how to formulate this question so please poke on
> me if you don't understand. :)
> If I for example have this in my .muttrc:
>
> color index blue black "~D"
> color index brightyellow black "~f winkle ~p"
>
> I
* On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm using mutt with an IMAP server and have a macro defined for d that
> saves a copy of the message to the Trash folder (i.e. macro index d
> "s=Trash\r"). I wanted to change the behavior of the d key back to
> its original meaning if I'm in
* On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Aldy Hernandez sez:
> [...]
> } For example, if someone mails me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'd like my return
> } address to be set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I reply to the message.
>
> Check out the reverse_name variable.
You'll need to also set $alte
* On Mon, 02 Sep 2002, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> I'd like to forward mails with attachments. At the moments
> these are forwarded inline.
If you're talking about forwarding a mail while including the
original as an attachment: See "mime_forward".
If you're talking about forwarding a messag
* On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> It seems like what is needed is something like a
> command in addition to the
(The correct command name is .)
> I guess you could create a macro to do something close to this
> by switching to a non-mailbox folder and then issuing a
* On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, John Keniry wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:48:47PM +0200, Martin Man wrote:
>
> > filename), with mailbox you have to grep for '^Status: O' to
> > see which messages are unread, and this could be quite CPU
> > intensive, IMHO that's why it's still left out of mutt, wou
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> John Iverson wrote:
>
> >> With Maildir, the folder will continue to show up as having
> >> new messages (I don't know if that, in and of itself is a
> >> good reason to switch to Maildir).
>
> > I&#
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> John Keniry wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:51:19PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > > John Keniry wrote:
>
> >>> Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders
> >>> contain unread mail other than opening them and looking for
> >>> it?
>
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Mickaël Villers wrote:
> I have few problems with new mails significations. Here is a
> example:
>
> I read a mbox ( debian-french-user for example ) and when I
> have finish, I go to the mailboxes list (c?) and
> wait/check for new mails on others mbox (like mutt-users).
* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> > The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new
> > mail is when the user has "unset mark_old" in their
> > configuration. In this case a message that would ordinarily be
> > marked as old is still n
* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Mike Leone wrote:
> I use Maildir with IMAP, and I see *no* new mail notifications
> on the folders at all. When I open the mailbox (maildir), yes -
> the index or pager shows new messages. But using the "c"
> command to switch folders only ever shows the name of the
> fold
* On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Michael Elkins wrote:
> The only known issue (afaik) about Mutt *not* reporting new
> mail is when the user has "unset mark_old" in their
> configuration. In this case a message that would ordinarily be
> marked as old is still new, but won't be detected with the file
> mo
* On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> macro index q "~O ~d >20d\n+FOO\n"
or (untested):
macro index q "~r>20d!(~F|~N)"
(Delete if received more than 20 days ago, except for flagged or
new messages, and then quit.)
--
John
* On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * V_Suresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-25 08:09]:
> > How do I set the bg/fg color for the whole line, for a particular
> > header field?? Not just for the header alone, but the whole line
> > should have the same bg color?? How is this possible??
>
>
* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Rich wrote:
> I have tried actually binding the keys while i am in mutt with
> the command ":bind pager backspace previous-line"
Try ":bind pager previous-line"
--
John
* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my
> machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I
> directly make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Not with just Mutt by itself, but you might want to
* On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Eugene Lee wrote:
> I looked in the archives and couldn't find a specific answer
> this one. I receive several HTML messages that arrive as an
> attachment with no plain text equivalent in the main message
> body or another attachment. When I reply to these messages,
> ho
* On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> ,[ ~/.mutt/setup/macros ]-
> | [...]
> | ### remove ~N on all mail
> | macro index ,n
>"~NN~T"
> "Remove ~N flag on all mail"
> | [...]
> `-
You might want to replace the "N" above with "N", so
it turns off the N flags instead of toggling, thus ma
* On Tue, 09 Jul 2002, Mark Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying set realname using a folder-hook. Tried this:
>
> folder-hook . set realname="Mark Johnson"
> folder-hook in-mutt set realname="Mark"
>
> and variants, but can't seem to get it working.
Try enclosing your set c
* On Sat, 06 Jul 2002, Jeff Maxson wrote:
> using debian sid (mostly), i386, exim, fetchmail. Using pine (the old
> standby) I can send out mail (I'm using that now) and it actually arrives
> at a final destination. Using mutt, I can get/read mail, but sending it
> from mutt seems to drop the
* On Sun, 07 Jul 2002, Sam Carleton wrote:
> I am new to mutt. I have installed both mutt and qmail on my UNIX
> machine. When I when to send mail via mutt, it ended up in
> ~/Maildir/outbox/cur.
Sounds like maybe that's where Mutt was told to save copies of
outbound messages via the "copy" an
* On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, John P Verel wrote:
> On 06/23/02 12:16 -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > how about:
> > * ^Return-Path: >
> > or:
> > * ^Sender: owner-mutt-users
>
> I use:
>
> * ^TO_mutt
> Mutt
Which of the above methods you want to use depends on how you
want to handle the situation w
* On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Is it possible to do?
>
> I am a bit tired of having a mailboxes line that spans two lines...
You can use the output of a command (within backticks), such as:
mailboxes ! `echo -n ~/Mail/*`
or whatever filemasks you need.
--
John
* On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> I have new mail colored brightcyan. Deleted is red. If I hit
> 'd' to delete mail, it turns red. If I delete the pattern ~N,
> they stay blue,
You mean brightcyan?
> but are marked as deleted. What's the difference here?
Order seems to be signif
* On Fri, 07 Jun 2002, Joseph Ishac wrote:
> Actually, I wasn't aware you could do that with the folder-hook
> command. :) However, I did a quick copy/paste on the lines
> below and it didn't remedy the problem.
Works as intended here -- maybe you had other 'color index'
commands which were in
* On Fri, 07 Jun 2002, Joseph Ishac wrote:
> No amount of reordering seemed to solve the problem, I've tried
> N different combinations (likely missing the right one of
> course :)
What I was originally thinking was not just reordering what you
had, but also moving the ~D, ~F, and ~T into your f
* On Thu, 06 Jun 2002, Joseph Ishac wrote:
> The desired effect would be to have the behavior of the hooks
> as well as always changing color for status changes (such as
> tagging, etc.)
I beleive the color used depends on the *last* matching color
index statement, so you might have to include t
* On Tue, 04 Jun 2002, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> It was put in CVS quite a while ago; i'm not sure what versions
> of mutt include it, though.
Doesn't seem to be in 1.3.99 or 1.4 (just upgraded). I tried
commenting out all indicator color and mono commands. I'm using
S-Lang -- would that matter?
* On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Adam Fields wrote:
> 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder
> with 2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
Open the folder, then do a limit ('l' by default) using the
pattern "~m 190-200".
> 2) What's the right way to do batch ref
* On Sun, 02 Jun 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> I am playing with more colors for the index. Way too cool. I
> can't believe I didn't do this stuff earlier. Anyway, I wanted
> to change the indicator, for example, for messages marked for
> deletion. Can the indicator color not be changed like th
* On Fri, 17 May 2002, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Actually, since it's just text in the quote, I like having them
> in the same color as the rest of the quote, which is how I have
> my quote_regexp configured.
Are you referring to my quote of David's example, or the
original? :-)
> > But it looks t
* On Thu, 16 May 2002, David Champion wrote:
> I don't find that multiple quotation styles at the *same*
> quotation depth is a very common occurrence. Much more common
> is that I'm being mailed something that begins with a column of
> '#' marks -- a shell script posted in reply to someone's
> c
* On Thu, 16 May 2002, David T-G wrote:
> You should probably continue to quoted5 or quoted6 to fill out
> your test, because ...
[ ... ]
> ... this appears to be looping except for the rematch on the
> last '>' line.
Yes, Mutt loops through the colors again if you go past the
defined quote le
* On Wed, 15 May 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! John Iverson spake thus:
> > why do the following lines show up in different colors?
>
> Well, first of all, the colors don't match what you said (at
> least for me).
Even with the same color settings
* On Thu, 16 May 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> mutt behaves the way you expect it to,
> that is the follwoing lines show up in
> "blue on default":
>
> > This is in "quoted" color
> > This is in "quoted" color again
>
> the follwoing lines however
> are not shown in the colors
> you wrote:
>
> |
With different colors set for different quote levels:
color quoted blue default
color quoted1 magenta default
color quoted2 red default
and using the default $quote_regexp and Mutt's built-in pager,
why do the following lines show up in different colors?
> This is in "quoted" c
* On Fri, 10 May 2002, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:15:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > when in a folder. Can someone please tell me how to get the
> > threaded view where arrows are used to indicate a thread. I
> > have seen some example pictures on the web, but
* On Thu, 09 May 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> why does this work:
> color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag"
>
> but not this:
> color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag: YES"
I think the quoting is wrong and there's no error with the first
one because there aren't any spaces in the expression.
* On Wed, 01 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep. This has been happening to me. Are you running a stable
> release? I'm running a cvs version, "1.5.0i (2002-01-22)". I
> figured the bug was just in the alpha version.
(Re-directing back to the list)
I'm running plain 1.3.28i with no patc
* On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Dean Richard Benson wrote:
> However I have a weird problem (or maybe its a feature! ;) that
> is bugging me. If a few folders have new mail in, I select one
> that I am wanting to read first, and move the cursor down to
> that folder and press enter. Most of the time tha
* On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Flavien wrote:
> I must be missing something. It does not work here... :-(
Actually, it was me who was missing something. I'm using "color
index" to match my old addresses, not "color header". So I'm
coloring the matched messages in the index, rather than coloring
the he
* On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Flavien wrote:
> I have som old addresses that some people still have in their
> address-books. I'd like to spot these people by colorizing the headers
> when matching one of those addresses. It works pretty well with :
>
> color header red black 'To:.*myold
* On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
> * John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-25 13:40]:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > I'm using this:
> > >
> > > macro index "\Cx" \
> > > "~N*" \
> > > &q
* On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Im Eunjea wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-21 04:35]:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > copy+paste from vim?
> >
> > anyway - this can be wrong if 'T' means
> > something else than .. :-(
> >
> > the following is a little longer - but should work
> > even when the
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, parv wrote:
> > Why not Just use the regular OR operator?:
>
> when one has to debug complex recipe (as procmail doesn't say what
> was actually matched), or during the creation of one, it's much
> easier to work w/ weighted recpie as one can easily (un)comment &
> test.
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, parv wrote:
> all these can be easily combined as one OR'd recipe (assuming mbox)...
>
> :0:
> # 000710 - catch messages from gateway address on sonytel.be
> * 2147483647^0 ^TOmutt-users@mail\.sonytel\.be
> #
> # 981009 - catch messages from gateway address on gbnet.net:
>
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Rob Reid wrote:
[ ... ]
> Granted, this doesn't catch the other mutt lists (because I don't
> need to), and IN.mutt would be a better name than muttin.
> Return-Path works (for now anyway) and is "cheaper" than ^TO.
My understanding is that some people prefer ^TO or ^TO_
On Sat 09 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % The patch offers "^" as a shortcut to the current folder.
>
> ... so now you can just
>
> send-hook . "my_hdr fcc: ^"
>
> and there ya go.
Cool, thanks for the info Michael and David.
John
Hi,
Is there a way to tell Mutt to save outgoing messages in whatever
mailbox I'm working in?
I'm currently setting "record" for each mailbox like this:
folder-hook . "set record='=sent'"
folder-hook box1"set record='=box1'"
folder-hook box2"s
62 matches
Mail list logo
