don't be silly about US export laws

1999-05-16 Thread Joe Rhett
appeal. And what makes you think the government won't? According to Cindy Curan, we've got another 2-3 years and most likely a Supreme Court case before you'll be able to export. -- Joe Rhett Chi

input names problem still not resolved

1999-03-07 Thread Joe Rhett
ts me from sending a filename that contains spaces. And certainly not the space is simply within the path. -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services PGP keys and contact informat

printing headers

1999-03-07 Thread Joe Rhett
oblem is that if I hit [h] to open in headers mode, then hit [p], the logical assumption is that I want to print the full headers. Unfortunately, it responds the same as the previous prints. What is involved in fixing this? -- Joe Rhett Systems Eng

list is still sending doubles

1999-02-08 Thread Joe Rhett
I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles, but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is there any good reason for the list to send 2 copies of everything? -- Joe Rhett Systems Engin

Re: mailing list madness

1999-02-06 Thread Joe Rhett
d not wanting to hack changes that patches with break, it would be a real pain. It would be easier to have the authorized_users file :include: the list file, which would provide the same benefit. -- Joe Rhett Systems Engi

Re: mailing list madness

1999-02-06 Thread Joe Rhett
de: syntax in the authorized users file, and it ended up being more work than I wanted to tackle at the time. When I look at the To: header thing, I'll look again. -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mailing list madness

1999-02-06 Thread Joe Rhett
am problem. [ Note: I realize that I'm coming off overly bitchy, but I'm the moderator for about 6 lists, many more out of the way than mutt-users. And I know exactly how many attempts are made to spam them. I also deal with the massive amounts of drek/spam coming from gn

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-05 Thread Joe Rhett
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:47:49PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:34:52PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah.. so should every user get put in here? Should sendmail be stopped and > > started every time a change of this

Re: Forging headers

1999-02-04 Thread Joe Rhett
s a mail delivery agent thing, and nothing Mutt can help you with. What I do is use sendmail's UserDB, which allows me to change my outgoing mail name, and then adding on the mailer flag (I believe either i or j) which tells sendmail to apply UserDB to the envelope as

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-04 Thread Joe Rhett
opriate file rights, everyone should have the root password? It gets the job done rather well, it seems. Be serious. He can do whatever he wants, but "it works" isn't a good enough reason for it to be a recommended solution. -- Joe Rhett

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-03 Thread Joe Rhett
e > wrong... Maybe .. I haven't look at this part of the code in a long, long time :-) In any case, it isn't the right answer. UserDB or genericstable are the general approaches to doing exactly what he needs. -- Joe Rhett Systems Engi

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-03 Thread Joe Rhett
rnings. Warning: you might as well be sending mail as "root" then, since you're giving yourself the right to do just about anything with sendmail. I highly recommending using the userdb or (I forgot about this before) the "genericstable" feature. -- Joe Rhett

bug ... er, lack of feature .. report

1999-01-25 Thread Joe Rhett
der information. Is it possible to make printing context-sensitive to the full headers? Issue #2: Shouldn't defining something with "lists" automagickally make it an alias? It would be nice. ( It there are reasons it wouldn't be nice, fire a

Re: to/cc/bcc address entry bug

1999-01-19 Thread Joe Rhett
lly like about mutt is that it puts a person into "append" mode on the To/Cc/Bcc lines. It would be nice to retain this feature as it stands today - just fix the bug :-) -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/

Re: mutt & pgp

1999-01-19 Thread Joe Rhett
rking on some better notes. But I'm not being rude to people because they can't figure it out for themselves. It took me the better part of 4 hours to get a working configuration that could send and recieve messages in both fashions, as neccessary. And it's pretty messy. -- Joe Rhet

Re: mutt & pgp

1999-01-19 Thread Joe Rhett
at is that while Mutt may be doing it right, you can get down off your high horse and help out the people who have to be able to work in a backwards compatible fashion. The current PGP-Notes documentation scratches the surface at best. I figured it out - as I'm sure many others have.. but

Re: to/cc/bcc address entry bug

1999-01-19 Thread Joe Rhett
it stays. It still doesn't make sense. If the current list is "person1, person2" and I hit "c" and type "person3", why should the truncated list contain only "person1" ? If it contained only "person3", I would

to/cc/bcc address entry bug

1999-01-19 Thread Joe Rhett
fall down over this one. BTW: This problem occurs in every address input field. If you open a new mail message and type: "person1, person2 person3" .. you will end up with only 1 recipient. -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]