Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why would you want to edit the References?
Because you're replying to another message just to pick up email
addresses and possibly a quote and/or common thought that isn't really
thread-specific, but want to start a new thread?
> It could be break u
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to mutt (actually, I'm only reading my mail on it because of that
> little problem...) and I'm enjoying it a lot.
>
> We have an intranet here and there are a few specific machines that are
> the MTAs for the "external" world. I was readin
Manoj Kasichainula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> > filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
>
(Mutt 1.0pre2, pgp 5 on what's basically Red Hat Linux 6.0 with some
security updates)
1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
[I'm CCing this to HJ to see if he can send me the other patches he
mentioned]
I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I read via IMAP from multiple machines, so no fetchmail/procmail combo works]
> The rest of the office is using Outlook with PGP
> support, but that sends old-style PGP bodies and sets the
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
> handle this quite nicely.
I read mail on more than one machine. I can have fetchmail leave the
mail on the server, but then it doesn't get deleted from the server when
I delete it.
