I wish to send an e-mail to Bill Gates but can't remember under what
alias I've got him -- bg? billg? bgates? I know I can less my
alias file from another window -- but is there a way to locate an
alieas easily from mutt?
Dirk
Viktor Lakics skryf:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:52:08AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:30:00AM +0100, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> >
> > > This is probably a FAQ, sorry for that if it is. I frequently want to
> > > attach on of my previous mails from the sent folder. But wi
Suresh Ramasubramanian skryf:
> Dirk Laurie proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > When retrieving mail from a POP server, it gets dumped straight into
> > my inbox, without passing through my .procmailrc. I can think of
> > several solutions to this problem:
>
> I
When retrieving mail from a POP server, it gets dumped straight into
my inbox, without passing through my .procmailrc. I can think of
several solutions to this problem:
1. Instead of just invoking mutt, use a shell script that first
calls fetchmail.
Disadvantage: I need to quit and restar
When retrieving mail from a POP server, it gets dumped straight into
my inbox, without passing through my .procmailrc. I can think of
several solutions to this problem:
1. Instead of just invoking mutt, use a shell script that first
calls fetchmail.
Disadvantage: I need to quit and restart
Is there any way to set variables while mutt is running?
Setting them in .muttrc is fine most of the time, but
sometimes I just want to override that setting for a while
without restarting mutt.
Dirk
I can't pipe a startup mailbox to mutt, because
cat mailbox | mutt
is treated as an instruction to mail what is piped in. Some Unix
commands use the filename "-" as an alias for standard input, but
cat mailbox | mutt -f -
does not work. Of course, this trivial example can be handled by
mut
Some mailing lists etc. are distributed in digest form, i.e.
they have some header/index stuff etc., after which the body
consists of concatenated e-mails maybe with some standard
separator. Can mutt un-digest them, i.e. can I view them
as if separate mails in a folder?
Dirk
Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender only.
E.g. "Listen old chap, I d
Jürgen Salk skryf:
> Dirk Laurie wrote:
>
> > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
> viewer-form
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus
signs to show
Dirk Laurie skryf:
>
> 1. In my "<" folder, display not the sender (which is always me)
>but the recipient.
>
I've asked the wrong question here. Mutt is not so stupid as to display
the sender when it is me.
The problem is that mutt does not know the sende
Andreas Grytz skryf:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> > I'd like mutt to do the following for me:
> >
> > 3. When I send mail to a recipient known from my mail-aliases or
> >list aliases, file it into the corres
I'd like mutt to do the following for me:
1. In my "<" folder, display not the sender (which is always me)
but the recipient.
2. When I have read something in the "!" folder, only file it
in ">" when the sender is not a correspondent recognized from
my mail-aliases and list aliases. Ot
14 matches
Mail list logo
