On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:33:45PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-09-30, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > On 09/29/2011 06:17 AM, Leonardo M. Ram? wrote:
> >> Hi, does anyone knows if it can be possible to read/subscribe to newsgroups
> >> (nntp) with mutt?.
> >
> > Mutt is just an MUA, and attempt
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:24:49PM -0300, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> Mutt have a search function, / , the is very simple. But, it do search
> only in the to: and subject: fields.
>
> Are ther a way to do search in all field (to:, subject:, body, etc) of
> messages?
>
Yes, there's a set of ~ pa
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:04:56AM -0700, William Yardley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:56:13AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
>
> > * On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 05:58PM +0100 Chris G (c...@isbd.net) muttered:
> > > As a result I need to move some IMAP mail from some local backu
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:56:13AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 05:58PM +0100 Chris G (c...@isbd.net) muttered:
> > As a result I need to move some IMAP mail from some local backups
> > (copies made just before the move) to the new IMAP server. How do I do
&
I have recently moved my mail hosting, not from one ISP to another but
from one platform to another.
As a result I need to move some IMAP mail from some local backups
(copies made just before the move) to the new IMAP server. How do I do
this so that the directory structure is preserved?
To be s
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 07:00:46PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:17:49 -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > $ stat rsyncfrom/*
> > File: `rsyncfrom/bar'
> > Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 regular empty file
> > Device: 805h/2053d Inode: 41
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 05:50:34PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:40:06PM -0800, John Magolske wrote:
> > > I'd like the original (source) mailboxes to retain their N's, I'm not
&
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:40:06PM -0800, John Magolske wrote:
> * Chris G [110308 14:30]:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:26:41PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:11:59PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Ma
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:50:26PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:29:47PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote:
> > > > Af
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:54:23AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:45PM -0800, John Magolske wrote:
> > After doing an rsync backup, the "N" preceding mailboxes with new mail
> > is removed from all mailboxes. I suppose this is a result of the mbox
> > files being touched
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:54:29PM -0500, Ed Blackman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:26:03PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:49:33PM -0500, Ed Blackman wrote:
> >>You can tell Mutt to use RFC2047 decoding on MIME file names with
> >>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:49:33PM -0500, Ed Blackman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:06:52AM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >I had something *vaguely* similar yesterday, a supplier sent me a note
> >about an order I had placed and it was:-
> >
> > [-- application/octet
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
> hello all,
>
> please skip this mail and excuse the noise if you hate slightly OT posts.
>
> I recently got attachments which were really pdfs but couldn't be detected as
> such because they had strange content-type names:
>
> a
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:45:40AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:29:24PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > > However when I come to read mail in the morning the incoming E-Mail has
> > > been accessed by my backup system and the above mechanism doesn't w
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:58:27AM +, Chris G wrote:
> Is there any way I can force mutt to scan all files in 'mailboxes' for
> new mail?
>
> In general during the day everything works fine, new mail is detected in
> the normal way by seeing if the access time is
Is there any way I can force mutt to scan all files in 'mailboxes' for
new mail?
In general during the day everything works fine, new mail is detected in
the normal way by seeing if the access time is before the modified time.
However when I come to read mail in the morning the incoming E-Mail ha
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:38:43AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > Setting a ISO-8859 locale will mostly work but it's not so all
> > encompassing as using UTF-8 so if you can use UTF-8 it's better.
> > ISO-8859 character sets are basically only the 'Roman' character sets of
> > western[ish] E
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:58:12AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:52:22PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> > Someone must have solved this problem before, but all the Googling in the
> > world isn't helping me so far.
>
> on my FreeBSD system, which i believe you are usi
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:47:26PM +0100, Arele wrote:
> Hi.
> I would like to view some html's messages in external browser like
> iceweasel/firefox, opera,...
> I have configured to see the html message with w3m or links2 but
> sometimes I would like to view all the message in graphical browser
.
>
That sounds like a sensible solution, thanks.
> best regards,
> charlie
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:50:15PM +, Chris G wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:35:20PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 19:56:13 +, Chris
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:35:20PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 19:56:13 +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > Sitting for tens of seconds while mutt retrieves a key from a web site
> > is just silly.
> >
> > Is there a way to turn this off whil
Now that I have implemented PGP (for one correspondent who wants it) I'm
realising why I didn't do so before.
It takes *ages* for mutt to show any message from a new correspondent
who has a PGP signature.
Seriously this is a big issue for me, I *really* don't care who wrote
most of the messages I
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:12:54PM -0900, Roger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:53:22PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >(e)ncrypt - presumably encrypts the message and, when it asks "Enter
> >keyID for x...@yyy.zzz: " one enters the keyID for the *recipient*.
I have configured PGP with mutt (1.5.20 running on Xubuntu 10.04)
according to the instructions at:-
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG
It seems to be basically working but I have some questions about
actually using it. I'm not doing any automatic signing or encryption, I
only want to us
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:59:50AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 20 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
> > By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
> > directory in which it was started). In my case this is often somewhere
> > completely rando
By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
directory in which it was started). In my case this is often somewhere
completely random and most definitely isn't where I want to save
attachments.
Apart from being careful about the dreictory from which I start mutt is
ther
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:00:43PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Thursday, October 28, 2010 a las 11:50:23AM +0100, Chris G escribió:
> >
> > > I have a small home LAN and have one machine set up as a se
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 03:26:27PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>
> > There are no web clients of any sort involved. I just have four or five
> > machines on a LAN with one always on server machine. Most of the time I
> > send mail from my desktop machine using mutt but occasionally I send
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:07:20AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris G [10-28-10 09:57]:
> > What I was hoping/imagining might be possible was to tell mutt that the
> > sendmail it should use is on another machine. Given that that is a
> > trusted/closed network b
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:39:42AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:00:43PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > El d�a Thursday, October 28, 2010 a las 11:50:23AM +0100, Chris G
> > >
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:00:43PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, October 28, 2010 a las 11:50:23AM +0100, Chris G escribió:
>
> > I have a small home LAN and have one machine set up as a server machine.
> > That machine has postfix on it fully configured to bot
I have a small home LAN and have one machine set up as a server machine.
That machine has postfix on it fully configured to both send and receive
mail.
Is it possible to use the sendmail (well, postfix's sendmail) on that
machine from other machines on the LAN to send mail? Otherwise I have
to c
Do many people here still use abook? It hasn't been updated for several
years now (although that doesn't mean it's no good necessarily).
Or are there alternative ways of maintaining the mutt alias list (and
maybe an addressbook as well) nowadays?
--
Chris Green
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:36:04PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:36:17PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Thus when I do a L[ist reply] I get an E-Mail sent to *both* list
> > addresses which is a bit annoying. This happens because both list
> > add
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Chris G on Friday, 22 October 2010:
> > I subscribe to one mailing list which has two addresses both of which
> > are used fairly frequently. So my mutt 'subscribe' entries have two
> &g
I subscribe to one mailing list which has two addresses both of which
are used fairly frequently. So my mutt 'subscribe' entries have two
entries relating to one list.
Thus when I do a L[ist reply] I get an E-Mail sent to *both* list
addresses which is a bit annoying. This happens because both l
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:02:11AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> I heard that firefox is client-server in that it will open link in a remote
> running instance of firefox. If firefox is not already running, it will
> start one and close the current instance and then start again to connect to
> the new
I'm sure this used to work for me but I have changed a few things in
this area recently so I may have broken it by leaving something vital
out.
I have mutt set up so that by default HTML messages are displayed in
the pager using links. However if I want to view the E-Mail in
firefox I hit 'v' an
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:28:14AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> Thanks for all the help so far. :-)
>
> I've been thinking (now that's something!) about how mutt interacts
> with mail delivery programs and I'm realising that I don't *really*
> understand how
Thanks for all the help so far. :-)
I've been thinking (now that's something!) about how mutt interacts
with mail delivery programs and I'm realising that I don't *really*
understand how it all works regarding locking etc.
Take a trivially simple case, mail for user chris is delivered to
/var/ma
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:18:41PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris G [08-09-10 18:11]:
> > Can anyone point me at some code that shows how I should do mbox
> > locking in a way that will work with mutt?
> >
> > This is on an Ubuntu 9.10 (probably soon 10.04)
Can anyone point me at some code that shows how I should do mbox
locking in a way that will work with mutt?
This is on an Ubuntu 9.10 (probably soon 10.04) system.
I need to know what locking calls I must make (fcntl, or lockf, or
what), do I need to do dot-locking as well, what is the necessary
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:23:17PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Chris G on Monday, 09 August 2010:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:20:05PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > [snip my mutt/mbox/NFS issues]
> >
> > Can someone clarify something for me please, ignore NFS and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:20:05PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
[snip my mutt/mbox/NFS issues]
Can someone clarify something for me please, ignore NFS and assume I'm
running mutt and the mail delivery agent on the same system on a local
hard disk.
If I open my inbox with mutt and leave it displ
I'm having problems getting mutt and a python script to play nicely
together with an mbox format mailbox. I get different symptoms
according to whether mutt is accessing the mailbox directly or via NFS.
If I open the mbox file with mutt and have mutt displaying the index
of messages and then the
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:10:36PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:38:01PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> >I'm trying to b[ounce] a message and I'm getting the following error
> >on the mutt status line:-
> >
> >SMTP session failed: 550
I'm trying to b[ounce] a message and I'm getting the following error
on the mutt status line:-
SMTP session failed: 550 Sender invalid
So what is it saying? Obviously "Chris@" id invalid but how is mutt
creating it and what is missing such that mutt can't create a valid
address?
--
Chri
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 02:19:48PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote:
> Quoting Chris G on Tue, Jul 27 22:10:
> >
> > I use my home brew python delivery program because it (for me) is much
> > better than procmail or similar. In particular I can add a mailing
> > list entry to a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:09:59PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > I'm seeing the "Stale NFS file handle" messages on the mutt status
> > line, I'm not *absolutely* sure when they are occurring but it
I'm running mutt on Linux (Ubuntu 9.10) with my incoming mail arriving
on an NFS mounted directory.
I.e. /home/chris/Mail is a symbolic link to /snake1/home/chris/Mail
which is a directory on another system (snake1) which is where the
mail is actually delivered. Mail is delivered to multiple
sub-
I used to run mutt on my desktop machine at home with the following in
my .mailcap file:-
text/html; /usr/bin/firefox %s
text/html; links -dump %s -html-numbered-links 1; copiousoutput;
nametemplate=%s.html
With "auto_view text/html" in my muttrc this means that by default I
got to see H
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> > Only if it knows which ones have new mail in them! That's where we
> > came in.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:07:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> > >
> > I don't really want to know when new mail arrives, what I want is the
>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:05:31PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> [1]
> If mutt knows not to flag the transferred email as new, then it also
> knows enough not chuck up the erroneous "New mail" message. The logic
> used for the message flags is different from that used for confusing
> the use
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:00:13AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 03:05:14PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> >I can't reproduce this, neither with $check_mbox_size set or
> >unser. Unless, of course, I copy a message that is flagged as
> >New.
>
> I've seen this sporadicall
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:07:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Jun 24 16:09, Chris G wrote:
> > After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
> > to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
> > should scan all files in a particu
After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
should scan all files in a particular directory for new mail.
If one does have more than one (and non-standard) incoming mail
destinations then it's almost inevit
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:48:15PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > > Getting back to your problem I have just realised something, when you
> > > copy a mail message to another mailbox it *is* a new message in that
> > > mailbox. I have just tried it and I get exactly the s
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 03:05:14PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Chris G on Thursday, June 24, 2010 at 13:45:26 +0100
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:29:25PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> >>> I
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Michael Ludwig schrieb am 23.06.2010 um 14:23 (+0200):
> > Christian Ebert schrieb am 22.06.2010 um 23:16 (+0200):
> > > * Michael Ludwig on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 22:27:06 +0200
> >
> > > > How can new mail detection be repaired
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:29:25PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > >
> > I'm getting the feeling that, maybe, very few people are now using
> > mutt with mbox so that an 'out of the box' insta
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:32:38PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> > Erik Christiansen schrieb am 24.06.2010 um 19:18 (+1000):
> > > Since upgrading to ubuntu 10.04, and therefore Mutt 1.5.20, saving a
> > > read mail to another ma
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:40:42PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> I'm confused, what is going on, surely mutt should recognise a *new*
> file as one that has new mail in it.
>
... but maybe it doesn't. In fact how would it recognise a newly
created file as one having new mail in it,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:21:39PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> I have now got my new server running and I'm testing out mutt with
> mbox mail storage and with atime set.
>
> This message is really just a test message to myself, sorry for the
> noise.
>
> I will however rep
I have now got my new server running and I'm testing out mutt with
mbox mail storage and with atime set.
This message is really just a test message to myself, sorry for the
noise.
I will however report if it all works or not.
--
Chris Green
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:23:10PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Christian Ebert schrieb am 22.06.2010 um 23:16 (+0200):
> > * Michael Ludwig on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 22:27:06 +0200
>
> > > How can new mail detection be repaired for 1.5?
> >
> > I'm using Maildir, but
> >
> > set check_mbox
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:22:53AM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Chris G on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 09:31:26 +0100
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:28:48AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> >>> set check_mbox_size=yes
> >>>
> >>> looks like a good candidat
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:28:48AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > set check_mbox_size=yes
> >
> > looks like a good candidate.
> >
> > Look in man(5) muttrc whether it is available for your version.
> >
> When I moved from mutt 1.4 to 1.5 (quite a while ago) I
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:16:32PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Michael Ludwig on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 22:27:06 +0200
> > Yesterday I built Mutt 1.5 on Cygwin, which worked fine; and today I
> > discovered the Cygwin maintainers have done so as well. So Cygwin 1.7
> > now has Mutt 1.5.
>
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:23:15AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Wed, May 05, 2010 01:11PM +0100 Chris G (c...@isbd.net) muttered:
> > Is there a mutt variable to set default folder (directory and file)
> > permissions when saving/copying messages?
>
> In short - no exce
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:18:14AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 05 May 2010, Michael Elkins wrote:
> >
> > Mutt currently doesn't have a way to change the umask (I guess
> > nobody has asked for this before :-). It is hardcoded to 077 when
> > Mutt initializes. If you can recompile, the
Is there a mutt variable to set default folder (directory and file)
permissions when saving/copying messages?
My umask is 022 so files and directories created outside of mutt
are mostly readable by any user (which is what I want). However mail
folders created by mutt are only readable by me - how
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:17:04PM +0100, Christoph Ludwig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:37:15AM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > I subscribe to mailing lists as c...@isbd.net rather than my real local
> > E-Mail, mail for that address is auto-forwarded from the server
I subscribe to mailing lists as c...@isbd.net rather than my real local
E-Mail, mail for that address is auto-forwarded from the server where
it arrives to my local mailbox. This allows me to easily transfer all
my mailing list mail to another delivery address if I need to.
However I have a probl
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:51AM +0900, Horacio Sanson wrote:
>
> I send a long email to a mailing list but after sending it I realized I
> send the email using the wrong from: address. Of course the message got
> bounced
> back because that address is not registered in the mailing list.
>
> N
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:46:58PM -0500, Chuck Smith wrote:
> This is my first week of using MUtt and so far I love it! I have been doing a
> lot of reading and configuring and clearly can see the power of the Mutt.
>
> I have a interesting displying issue that I would like to sort out but it
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:23:07PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
> On Do, 04 Feb 2010, Chris G wrote:
>
> > One can go straight to a specific mailbox with something like:-
> >
> > mutt -f =boating/buyOurBoat/fredMolina
> >
> >
One can go straight to a specific mailbox with something like:-
mutt -f =boating/buyOurBoat/fredMolina
but is there a way to open a specific mail message in that mailbox
(from the command line)?
--
Chris Green
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:37:35AM +, Toby Cubitt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:34:17AM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > On So, 31 Jan 2010, Chris G wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any fairly straightforward way to save what you see in the
> > > mutt pager
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:34:17AM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
> On So, 31 Jan 2010, Chris G wrote:
>
> > Is there any fairly straightforward way to save what you see in the
> > mutt pager as a file? I want to record some E-Mail as files for
> >
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:45:16AM +0800, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> On 31.01.10,17:12, Chris G wrote:
> > Is there any fairly straightforward way to save what you see in the
> > mutt pager as a file? I want to record some E-Mail as files for
> > another application and what I
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 06:26:01PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
> * Chris G [31-01-2010 17:12]:
>
> > Is there any fairly straightforward way to save what you see in the
> > mutt pager as a file? I want to record some E-Mail as files for
> > another application and what I
Is there any fairly straightforward way to save what you see in the
mutt pager as a file? I want to record some E-Mail as files for
another application and what I need to do basically is save what I can
see on the screen as a file which I can name.
--
Chris Green
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:54:21AM +, chombee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:23:42PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > * On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 02:20PM + chombee (chom...@lavabit.com) muttered:
> > > I've noticed that mutt doesn't seem to write changes to my local
> > > maildirs until I hi
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:05:29PM +, Chris G wrote:
> Will the mutt list allow attachments - I'll try, they're not very big
> so I'm sure they won't hit any size restrictions.
>
It does allow attachments! :-)
Just a bit more information, the format of the filte
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:44:25AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 2:11 PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >I can upload/attach the scripts if anyone is interested, getAliases.py
> >and getLists.py are trivial but there's a bit more to the mail
> >filtering
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:29:11AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Wed 20, Jan'10 at 10:09 AM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >You need to set up an alias for the list in order to be able to use a
> >shorted name for it when composing new mail.
>
> Yeah, I just never bothered with
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:18:54AM +0900, Horacio Sanson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:57:29PM +0100, Brian Durant wrote:
> > Dale A. Raby wrote:
> > >I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure you need the following in your .muttrc
> > >file in order to access a gmail account via IMAP:
> > >
> > >s
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:05:27AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Tue 19, Jan'10 at 9:41 PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> >Then "mutt users" is a subscribed lists *and* a known list.
> >
> >Should not I therefore be able to type a distinct part of the mailing list
> >in a To field?
>
> I think it affects
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 07:01:03PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:42:48PM +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> >
> > What is the advantage of running mutt within emacs?
>
> Short answer:
> You don't have to navigate to Emacs (server) when editing a message.
>
> Longer answ
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:12:53PM +0200, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Chris G wrote on 25.09.09:
> > Are there any obvious ways either within mutt or using some sort of
> > external tool which would allow archiving and/or deletion of messages
> >
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:35:46PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:25:55PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:17:58PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > > > Are there
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:17:58PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Are there any obvious ways either within mutt or using some sort of
> > external tool which would allow archiving and/or deletion of messages
> > olde
Are there any obvious ways either within mutt or using some sort of
external tool which would allow archiving and/or deletion of messages
older than a certain date?
My ideal would be a tool that I could run either manually (or maybe
from cron, but that might be a bit daring) which would select all
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote:
> On 23-09-2009, at 15h 21'53", Chris G wrote about "Re: How to remove empty
> maildir?"
> > >
> > There's no atomic way of checking if all three sub-directories are
> > e
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:08:52AM -0300, Monte Stevens wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:45:47PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote:
> > The logic I need is:
> >
> > if maildir A has no mails(new/ tmp/ cur/ are empty)
> > rm -r A
> > endif
>
> From http://www.google.com/search?q=bash+test+em
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:21:35AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 23 at 08:16 PM, quoth Wu, Yue:
> >Hi, list, question is how to use some commands(i.g. shell commands) to remove
> >the empty maildirs, i.e. no any file in maildirs' new/ cur/ and tmp/?
>
> If you know it won't
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:46:47AM -0400, James Michael Fultz wrote:
> What are opinions on using a maildir for both $spoolfile and
> $folder with extended maildir subfolders *and* storing mbox
> folders inside? Does this seem to be a Really Bad Idea or, does
> anyone else see an appeal in having
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:09:56PM -0400, Dave Dodge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:27:09PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > anyway when does one want to edit messages, it's not something I've
> > ever wanted to do.
>
> I used to have the same opinion before I had
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
