On Sat, May 19, at 07:18 Danny wrote:
> Here is my folder-hooks file,
>
> # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> #
> # Change settings based on mailbox
> #
> # folder-hook [!]
> #
> # is executed when opening a mailbox matching
> #folder-hook `exho =in
On Thu, May 17, at 08:06 Danny wrote:
> > > The `mutt -D` output is more useful, though, since that shows the
> > > result of *all* the config files (and we don't have to worry about
> > > whether we missed something).
>
> mutt -D does nothing. My version of mutt is 1.5.9i. I think I will look aro
Hi Josh!
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Josh wrote:
> I love mutt, but I get all my mail using fetchmail from several
> accounts, and I would really like to be able to respond to people from
> the same address that they sent their mail to. I looked through some of
> the archive and couldn't find any
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> The only thing I am wondering about is that mutt lists the keys instead
> of just using it :). (I think it is mutt, because it looks like the
> usual mutt-chose-file-or-similar-menu ;)
Well, as a test, I just encrypted an email to myself. Mutt
Hi Thomas!
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> Hiho...
> I just installed 1.2.2, read the README.UPGRADE and sourced gpg.rc
> into my muttrc.
>
> Being a GPG-newbie I am wondering why it asks me to choose a key from
> the following list now:
>
>1 + 1024/0xBFB1428C DSA -s T
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Vincent Danen wrote:
> Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
> stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
> difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
> produces the same output:
The spec-hel
Hi CaT!
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
> I had both /tmp and /var/spool/mail filled up. I selected two msgs for
> deletion as well as read one document. It would not let me quit. I
> trie dit multiple times. I freed up space on /var/spool/mail so that it
> has 160meg free and it still would no
Submitted 30 May 2000 by David T-G:
| This is something that has been bothering me for a while... If that's
| the case, then why does
|
| send-hook . set pgp_autosign
| send-hook (skip|topgunch|guckes)unset pgp_autosign
|
| work as expected -- t
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jan Houtsma wrote:
| On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 03:40:51PM -0700, AG wrote:
| > Hi Jan!
| >
| > On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jan Houtsma wrote:
| >
| > |
| > | Another wierd thing It ONLY happens if i run the 'su - caroline'
| > | via that
| I've an interesting quandry and can't find the answer in the manual. My
| mail is presorted by procmail into multple mbox spoolfiles. Each of these
| hase an mbox-hook telling it where to put read mail. Unfortunately,
| except for the catch-all box, which can be defined as $spoolfile, the
| b
I've an interesting quandry and can't find the answer in the manual. My
mail is presorted by procmail into multple mbox spoolfiles. Each of these
hase an mbox-hook telling it where to put read mail. Unfortunately,
except for the catch-all box, which can be defined as $spoolfile, the
boxes are d
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Carlos Puchol wrote:
| hi, thanks for your tip.
| it looks like the problematic part of the rpm spec is this one:
|
| %install
| rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
| make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr \
| sharedir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc \
| sysconfdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc \
| docdir=$
12 matches
Mail list logo
