On 29.11.17 15:09, Daan van Rossum wrote:
> Dear mutt users, I use two separate mailboxes for received and sent
> emails, called "mbox" and "sent" respectively. When reading old
> threads I sometimes wish I had sent and received mail in one and the
> same mbox. I know it is easy to merge sent and
On 2017-11-30 00:22, David Woodfall wrote:
> This is interesting. If I have several mailboxes would it be
> possible to set the record = current folder on something?
https://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/MuttFaq/Folder#HowtosavecopiesofoutgoingsenteMailstothecurrentfolder
:-)
-tkc
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 22:20:00 +0100, Wim wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November at 15:09, Daan van Rossum wrote:
> Do any of you mutt users have experience with merged vs. split
> mailboxes and have some good arguments for one or the other setup?
I starting using one box for received and sent emai
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 22:20:00 +0100, Wim wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 November at 15:09, Daan van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Do any of you mutt users have experience with merged vs. split
> > mailboxes and have some good arguments for one or the other setup?
>
> I starting using one box for received and
On Wednesday, 29 November at 15:09, Daan van Rossum wrote:
> Do any of you mutt users have experience with merged vs. split
> mailboxes and have some good arguments for one or the other setup?
I starting using one box for received and sent emails 3 years ago and
have never looked back. If threads
Dear mutt users, I use two separate mailboxes for received and sent emails,
called "mbox" and "sent" respectively. When reading old threads I sometimes
wish I had sent and received mail in one and the same mbox. I know it is easy
to merge sent and mbox in mutt. But I wonder what the disadvant
