thanks a lot for that precisely description.
Best Regards,
Oliver
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> (re-adding mutt-users to Cc:, there's no Mail-Followup-To: or Reply-To:
> in the header and I'm new to this list (but not mutt) so I'll just
> follow git and linux-kernel mail
In-Reply-To: <20150614193616.ga...@tweddell.de>
<20150614045940.GA3721@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 09:59:40PM -0700, Tom Fowle wrote:
[reformatted for brevity]
> I often save individual incomming emails in seperate files in my
> home directory with the mutt "s" command. In any
On 2015-06-17 02:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-1.html#ss1.6
Thanks for the pointers.
Bob> Debian's mutt packaging links against gnutls.
I should perhaps have made clear that I was aware of thi
* Peter P. [2015-06-17 13:04]:
> Hi mutt and friends
>
> when I try to save an attachment from within mutt to a directory that is
> mounted on an sshfs volume, mutt tells me that
> fopen: File exists (errno = 17)
> and writes an empty file with the correct name to that location.
> It then o
Hi mutt and friends
when I try to save an attachment from within mutt to a directory that is
mounted on an sshfs volume, mutt tells me that
fopen: File exists (errno = 17)
and writes an empty file with the correct name to that location.
It then offers to save the file to the same path/file
On 15/06/15, Eric Wong wrote:
> Oliver Graute wrote:
> > I would like to apply patches received from a public mailinglist to a
> > git repository. There for i'am looking for an easy to handle maintainer
> > workflow for mutt and git. How do maintainers of known open source
> > projects handle thes
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:40:18AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Of course I know that it doesn't matter if I build binaries just for my
> > personal use and don't distribute them, but in fact I build debian
> > packages which are available over unauthenticated http, because I want a
> > quick wa
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> mutt is GPL. Apparently there is some license incompatibility between
> GPL and the openssl license which prohibits linking mutt with openssl,
> unless there is an exception for this specific situation.
Here is a nice summary of the issues:
https://people.gnome.org/~mark
