thanks a lot for that precisely description.

Best Regards,

Oliver

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote:
> (re-adding mutt-users to Cc:, there's no Mail-Followup-To: or Reply-To:
> in the header and I'm new to this list (but not mutt) so I'll just
>  follow git and linux-kernel mailing list (LKML) conventions for now)
>
> Oliver Graute <oliver.gra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 15/06/15, Eric Wong wrote:
>> > Oliver Graute <oliver.gra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > I would like to apply patches received from a public mailinglist to a
>> > > git repository. There for i'am looking for an easy to handle maintainer
>> > > workflow for mutt and git. How do maintainers of known open source
>> > > projects handle these workflow with incoming patches?
>> >
>> > I use the following macros to apply patches directly from mutt (once I'm
>> > in a project working directory):
>> >
>> > macro index A ":unset pipe_decode\n|(umask 0022 && git am -3)\n:set 
>> > pipe_decode\n"
>> > macro pager A ":unset pipe_decode\n|(umask 0022 && git am -3)\n:set 
>> > pipe_decode\n"
>>
>> is something similar possible with git apply? if I replace git am -3
>> with git apply I got an error "fatal: unrecognized input"
>
> Yes.  However, you would normally receive emails formatted using
> "git format-patch" (which may be sent directly via "git send-email")
> which are designed for use with "git am".
>
> I disable pipe_decode so mutt won't attempt to process/decode a message
> and throw off "git am" processing.
>
>> > I will often save/copy messages to a separate mbox and apply them all at
>> > once with "git am", perhaps editing them a little first (commit message
>> > fixes/addendums, adding signed-off-by: tags, etc...)
>>
>> can you describe me that more in detail. I'am new to mutt.
>
> mbox is the standard Unix mail box format, basically just a text file
> with all messages concatenated together.  "man 5 mbox" for details.
> I normally use Maildir for general mail storage, but prefer mbox as
> a temporary work space.
>
> Mutt can save (move) or copy files to any mbox (new or existing) via 's'
> or 'c' commands respectively hotkeys.
>
> I have "set mbox_type = mbox" in my muttrc to default to creating
> mboxes when an existing Maildir/mbox does not exist.
>
> Running "mutt -f /path/to/mbox" lets me localize my work to a certain
> patch series.  I normally use the 'e' key from within mutt to then edit
> an existing message (patch) with $EDITOR.  A simple change would be to
> add an "Acked-by: " tag at the end of the commit message.  Then I can
> save and edit the mbox without changing my normal Maildir.
>
> Instead of using mutt + 'e' key to edit patches, I might just edit/view
> the mbox directly in my $EDITOR (bypassing mutt completely), and run
> "git am" on the whole thing if I'm satisfied.  The mbox is just text,
> after all.
>
> Another thing I may do is just apply the patch as-is (via the above mutt
> "git am" binding), make changes to the working directory, and use
> "git commit --amend" to make further editorial changes to a patch.

Reply via email to