Re: Recent display changes?

2014-01-08 Thread Peter Davis
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Peter Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Rado Q wrote: > > =- Peter Davis wrote on Tue 7.Jan'14 at 16:28:20 -0500 -= > > > > > I recently upgraded to mutt 1.5.22 from ... Hmmm, whatever the > > > previous stable version was, I guess.

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-08 Thread Kim Christensen
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 03:14:08PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-01-08, Kim Christensen wrote: > > compared to postfix, sendmail, EXIM, qmail and the like. > > > > Noones arguing against using [me]smtp as the "real MTA" in this > > scenario :-) > > I think msmtp is great, and I've been us

Re: Recent display changes?

2014-01-08 Thread Peter Davis
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Rado Q wrote: > =- Peter Davis wrote on Tue 7.Jan'14 at 16:28:20 -0500 -= > > > I recently upgraded to mutt 1.5.22 from ... Hmmm, whatever the > > previous stable version was, I guess. It appears to me there have > > been some changes in the index display

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-08 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2014-01-08, Kim Christensen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:23:31PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> > On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote: >> > Do you need/want outbound messages to be queued if they can't be sent >> > immediatel

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-08 Thread Kim Christensen
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:23:31PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > > Do you need/want outbound messages to be queued if they can't be sent > > immediately? If yes, then you need a "real" MTA like

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-08 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2014-01-08, Richard Z wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote: >> >> > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. So >> > far I have been using postfix for mail transport. Which way is >> > better, an

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-08 Thread Richard Z
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:48:18PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-01-04, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > > > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. So > > far I have been using postfix for mail transport. Which way is > > better, and why? > > [I'm assuming you're using p

Re: Recent display changes?

2014-01-08 Thread Rado Q
=- Peter Davis wrote on Tue 7.Jan'14 at 16:28:20 -0500 -= > I recently upgraded to mutt 1.5.22 from ... Hmmm, whatever the > previous stable version was, I guess. It appears to me there have > been some changes in the index display. Specifically, I assume Mutt wasn't the only thing updated? Anyw